Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:17:30.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Polypyrrole Coating on Fe3O4 and Its Effect on Nanocomposite Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. Liong ,
A. W. Harter ,
R. L. Moore  and
W. S. Rees Jr
S. Liong
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332
A. W. Harter
Affiliation:
Signatures Technology Laboratory, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, GA 30332
R. L. Moore
Affiliation:
Signatures Technology Laboratory, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, GA 30332
W. S. Rees Jr
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332
Get access

Abstract

Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles were synthesized by chemical coprecipitation and were characterized using TEM, XRD, and VSM. XRD and TEM measurements indicate that the average particle size was approximately 10 nm. The nanoparticles were coated with polypyrrole using oxidative polymerization. TGA results show that the polypyrrole coating is 28.5wt%. TEM images indicate that the nanoparticles are bound in clusters by polypyrrole. Measurements show that nanoparticles may hinder curing of the polymer matrix, but they can be effective in producing composites with higher modulus and magnetic permeability at lower frequencies.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 847: Symposium EE – Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Materials , 2004 , EE13.34
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cullity, B.D., Introduction to Magnetic Materials. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1972).Google Scholar
2. Kittel, C., Physical Review 70 (11–12), 965 (1946).Google Scholar
3. Cornell, R.M. and Schwertmann, U., The Iron Oxides. (VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, 1996).Google Scholar
4. Smit, J. and Wijn, H.P.J., Ferrites. (John Wiley and Sons, Eindhoven, 1959).Google Scholar
5. Kohlman, R.S., Joo, J., and Epstein, A.J., in Physical Poperties of Polymer Handbook, edited by Mark, James E. (AIP Press, Woodbury, NY, 1996), pp. 435.Google Scholar
6. Kuhn, H.H. and Kimbrell, W.C., U.S. Patent No. 5, 030, 508 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Gee, S.H., Hong, Y.K., Erickson, D.W. et al., Journal of Applied Physics 93 (10), 7560 (2003).Google Scholar
8. Massart, R., IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 17 (2), 1247 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Kang, Y.S., Risbud, S., Rabolt, J.F. et al., Chemistry of Materials 8, 2209 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Kuhn, H.H., U.S. Patent No. 5, 108, 829 (April 28 1992).Google Scholar
11. Kuhn, H.H., Child, A.D., and Kimbrell, W.C., Synthetic Metals 71 (1–3), 2139 (1995).Google Scholar
12. Liu, K., Zhao, L., Klavins, P. et al., Journal of Applied Physics 93 (10), 7951 (2003).Google Scholar
13. Lee, H.S., Lee, W.C., and Furubayashi, T., Journal of Applied Physics 85 (8), 5231 (1999).Google Scholar
14. Vestal, C.R. and Zhang, Z.J., Chemistry of Materials 14, 3817 (2002).Google Scholar
15. Moumen, N., Veillet, P., and Pilleni, M.P., Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 149, 67 (1995).Google Scholar
16. Liu, J. and Wan, M., Journal of Polymer Science, Part A: Polymer Chemistry 38 (15), 2734 (2000).Google Scholar
17. Yang, X., Xu, L., Ng, S.C. et al., Nanotechnology 14 (6), 624 (2003).Google Scholar
18. Chen, W., Li, X., Xue, G. et al., Applied Surface Science 218 (1–4), 215 (2003).Google Scholar