Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T05:19:14.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energetics of Oxygen Interstitials in Cr and V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Brian S. Good  and
Evan Copland
Brian S. Good
Affiliation:
Materials Division, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland OH 44135
Evan Copland
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH
Get access

Abstract

Dissolved oxygen in group IIIA-VA (Nb, Ti, Zr, Y) based alloys is a fundamental problem, affecting both mechanical properties and oxidation resistance, yet details of the phenomenon are poorly understood. In these alloys, oxygen is more stable dissolved in the metal than as an oxide-compound. In contrast, alloys based on Ni, Fe, Al and Cr exhibit almost no oxygen solubility. To improve the performance of Nb and Ti based alloys it is necessary to understand the differences in oxygen solubility between these two groups of metals. As a first step we considered the energetics of interstitial oxygen in α-V and α-Cr. Both of these metals have a BCC structure, yet the oxygen solubility in V is much higher than that in Cr. We obtain total energies, densities of states and population analyses using the CASTEP plane-wave pseudopotential density functional computer code. The differences in the energetics and electronic structures of the two materials, particularly the partial densities of states associated with the interstitial oxygen, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 851: Symposium NN – Materials for Space Applications , 2004 , NN5.18
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hiraga, K., Onozuka, T. and Hirabayashi, M., Mat. Sci. Eng. 27, 35 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Segall, M. D., Lindan, P. L. D., Probert, M. J., Pickard, C. J., Hasnip, P. J., Clark, S. J., and Payne, M. C., J. Phys.: Cond. Mat. 14, 2717 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Kohn, W. and Sham, L. J., Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).Google Scholar
4. Vanderbilt, D., Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. and Ernzerhof, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (18), 3865 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Herman, F. and Skillman, S., “Atomic Structure Calculations,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963.Google Scholar
7. Mulliken, R. S., J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1833 (1955).Google Scholar