Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:03:47.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Structures of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Studied by NMR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

X.-P. Tang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
A. Kleinhammes
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
H. Shimoda
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
L. Fleming
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
K. Y. Bennoune
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
C. Bower
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
O. Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA Curriculum in Applied and Materials Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA
Y. Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA Curriculum in Applied and Materials Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3255, USA E-mail: yuewu@physics.unc.edu
Get access

Abstract

An individual single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) has been shown [1-4] to exhibit remarkable electronic properties which depend on its diameter and chirality. In this work, the 13C nuclear magnetic resonance technique is used to measure quantitatively the electronic density-of-state (DOS) at the Fermi level in a bulk SWNT sample. Two types of 13C nuclear spins are observed with drastically different nuclear spin-lattice relaxation time (Tl). About onethird of the 13C nuclear spins with shorter Tl, are identified to reside at the metallic SWNTs and two-thirds can be associated with the semiconducting SWNTs. For the metallic SWNTs, the DOS at the Feimi level is measured quantitatively, which is about 0.022 states/(eV·atom·spin). The measured electronic DOS at the Fermi level agrees with the theoretical prediction for metallic tubes. This study also found that the semiconducting SWNTs in bundles, in fact, possess weak metallic characters. This indicates that tube-tube interactions within SWNT bundles could change the electronic properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mintmire, J. W., Dunlap, B. I., White, C. T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 631 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Saito, R., et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 2204 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Wildoer, J. W. G., et al. , Nature 391, 59 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Odom, T. W., Huang, J-L., Kim, P., Lieber, C. M., Nature 391, 62 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Delaney, P. et al. , Nature 391, 466 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Thess, A. et al. , Science 273, 483 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Yildirim, T., Zhou, O., Fischer, J. E., Fullerene Based Materials, Andreoni, W., Ed. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, in press).Google Scholar
8. Ostroff, E. D. and Waugh, J. S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1097 (1966).Google Scholar
9. Winter, J., Magnetic Resonance in Metals (Clarendon, Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
10. Carver, G. P., Phys. Rev. B 2, 2284 (1970).Google Scholar
11. Hiroyama, Y. and Kume, K., Solid State Com. 65, 617 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Tycko, R., et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1912 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Antropov, V. P., et al. , Phys. Rev. B 47, R12373 (1993)Google Scholar
14. For this mechanism, the 13C T1 depends on the relative orientation between the external magnetic field and the local ppΦ, bonding. Then, the 13CT1 can be different at different carbon sites in the same SWNT. However, the anisotropic effect is (Pennington, C. H. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 53, R2967-2970 (1996)) too small to account for the observed large difference between T and T . Thus, the two components with different 13C T1 should reside at SWNTs with different electronic properties. This is further shown by the poor fitting of the M*(t) curve with a stretched exponential function.Google Scholar
15. Mintmire, J. W. and White, C. T., Appl. Phys. A 67, 65 (1998).Google Scholar
16. Kane, C. L. and Mele, E. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1932 (1997).Google Scholar
17. Mintmire, J. W. and White, C. T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2506 (1998).Google Scholar
18. Qin, L. C. et al. , Chem. Phys. Lett. 268, 101 (1997).Google Scholar
19. Lu, J. P. and Han, J., International J. High Speed Electronics and Systems 9, 101 (1998).Google Scholar
20. Hone, J. et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1042 (1998).Google Scholar