Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:04:56.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Structure of Tunable Materials MnAl and MnGa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. N. Chantis
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, South Dakota School óf Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701-3995
D. O. Demchenko
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, South Dakota School óf Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701-3995
A. G. Petukhov
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, South Dakota School óf Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701-3995
W. R. L. Lambrecht
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7079
Get access

Abstract

We present first-principle calculations of equilibrium lattice constants, band structures, densities of states and magnetocrystaline anisotropy energy for bulk MnAl and MnGa. The linear-muffin-tin-orbital (LMTO) method has been used within the framework of the local spin density approximation (LSDA). Both the atomic sphere approximation (ASA) and the full-potential (FP) versions of the LMTO method were employed. Calculations of the equilibrium structures were performed both for paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases of MnAl and MnGa. The results of these calculations indicate that the large tetragonal distortion of the crystal structure is caused by the spin polarization of the electronic subsystem. The magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy per unit cell for MnAl and MnGa is shown to be 0.244 meV and 0.422 meV respectively. This is in good agreement with previous calculations and some experimental data. Magnetic moments, density of states and dependence of magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy on the lattice constant ration c/a are also found to be in good agreement with previous results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tanaka, M., Harbison, J.P, Sands, T., Philips, B., Cheeks, T. L., Keramidas, V. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1565 (1993).10.1063/1.108642Google Scholar
2. Boeck, J. De, Oesterholt, R., Esch, A. Van, Bender, H., Bruynseraede, C., Hoof, C. Van and Borghs, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2744 (1996).10.1063/1.115584Google Scholar
3. Roy, W. Van, Bender, H., Bruynseraede, C., Boeck, J. De, Borghs, G., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 148, 97 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Daalderop, G. H. et al. , Phys. Rev. B 41, 11919 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.41.11919Google Scholar
5. Prinz, G. A., Science 250, 1092 (1990).10.1126/science.250.4984.1092Google Scholar
6. Boeck, J. De, Sands, T., Harbison, J. P., Scherer, A., Gilchrist, H., Cheeks, T. L., Tanaka, M. and Keramidas, V. G., Electronics Lett. 29, 421 (1993).10.1049/el:19930282Google Scholar
7. Sakuma, A., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 63, 1422 (1994).10.1143/JPSJ.63.1422Google Scholar
8. Sakuma, A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 187, 105 (1998).10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00115-2Google Scholar
9. Vlasova, N. I., Kandaurova, G. S., Shur, YA. S. and Bykhanova, N. N., Phys. Met. Metall. 51, 1 (1981).Google Scholar