Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T21:38:41.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrochemical, SECM, and XPS Studies of the Influence of H2 on UO2 Nuclear Fuel Corrosion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Michael E. Broczkowski
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B8
R. Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B8
Z. Ding
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B8
J.J. Noël
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B8
D.W. Shoesmith
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B8
Get access

Abstract

A combination of electrochemical, scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS), and time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF - SIMS) techniques are being employed to investigate the effects of dissolved hydrogen on the aqueous corrosion of uranium dioxide (UO2) under nuclear waste disposal conditions. Corrosion potential (ECORR) measurements indicate that the oxidation of dissolved hydrogen on noble metal ε-particles polarizes the UO2 nuclear fuel surface to reducing potentials (−300 – −400 mV vs. SCE; i.e., to ECORR values more negative than those observed under anoxic (argon-purged) conditions (−200 mV vs. SCE). A comparison of the behaviors observed on SIMFUEL specimens with and without incorporated noble metal ε-particles indicate that these particles may act as catalytic electrodes for H2 oxidation. It is the galvanic coupling of these particles to the UO2 matrix which suppresses the fuel corrosion potential thereby preventing oxidation of the fuel surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] McMurry, J., Dixon, D.A., Garroni, J.D., Ikeda, B.M., Stroes-Gascoyne, S., Baumgartner, P., and Melnyk, T.W.. Ontario Power Generation Report No: 06819-REP-01200-10092-R00 (2003).Google Scholar
[2] King, F. and Kolar, M., Ontario Power Generation Report No: 00819-REP-01200-10041-ROO (1999).Google Scholar
[3] Johnson, L.H., LeNeveu, D. M., King, F., Shoesmith, D.W., Kolar, M., Oscarson, D.W., Sunder, S., Onofrei, C., and J.L. Crosthwaite. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-11494-2, COG-95-552-2 (2000).Google Scholar
[4] King, F., Quinn, M.J., and Miller, N.H.. Swedish Nuclear Fuel Company (SKB) Report, SKB TR-99-27 (1999).Google Scholar
[5] Shoesmith, D.W., Noël, J.J., and Garisto, Frank, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 824, 8188 (2004).Google Scholar
[6] Shoesmith, D.W., J. Nucl. Mater. 282 (2000) 1.Google Scholar
[7] Santos, B.G., Nesbitt, H.W., Noel, J.J., and Shoesmith, D.W., Electrochim. Acta 49 (2004) 1863.Google Scholar
[8] Shoesmith, D. W., Noël, J.J., Qin, Z., Lee, C.T., Goldik, J.S., Santos, B.G., and Broczkowski, M.E., Ontario Power Generation Report No: 06819-REP-01200-10145-ROO (2005).Google Scholar
[9] Rudnicki, J.D., Russo, R., and Shoesmith, D.W., J. Electroanal. Chem, 372 (1994) 3.Google Scholar
[10] Shoesmith, D.W., Kolar, M., and King, F.. Corrosion 59 (2003) 802.Google Scholar
[11] Lucuta, P.G., Verrall, R.A., Matzke, H. and Palmer, B.J., J. Nucl. Mater. 178 (1991) 48.Google Scholar
[12] Gerwing, A.F., Doern, F.E., and Hocking, W.H., Surf. Interface Anal. 14 (1989) 559.Google Scholar
[13] He, X., Noël, J.J., and Shoesmith, D.W.. J. Electrochem. Soc. (9) B440-B449 (2002) 149.Google Scholar
[14] Wipf, D. O. In Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy; Bard, A. J., Mirkin, M. V., Eds.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2001, pp 1774.Google Scholar
[15] Broczkowski, M.E., Noël, J.J., and Shoesmith, D.W.. J. Nucl. Mater. 346 (2005) 16.Google Scholar