Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T18:03:13.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical Relaxation Studies in Fluorite Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Partho Sarkar
Affiliation:
Ceramic Engineering Research Group Department of Materials Science and Engineering McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Patrick S. Nicholson
Affiliation:
Ceramic Engineering Research Group Department of Materials Science and Engineering McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Electric relaxation in CeO2-M203 (M34 sY3+, La3+) solid solutions has been investigated as a function of temperature (373K-673K) using the electric modulus formalism in the frequency range 5 to 107Hz. Two relaxation processes are observed in dilute solid solutions. The low frequency process is identified as a long range migration of free oxygen-vacancies (Process A) and the high frequency process is due to reorientation relaxation of the (MceVo) charged associates (Process B). The relaxation process is analysed using a non-exponential decay function, ø(t)=exp[-(t/τo)B] for O<β≤1, of the electric field. The observed activation enthalpy minimum as a function of dopant concentration for the Process A is explained using the concept of incomplete dissociation of oxygen-vacancies from (MceVo) defect associates and the formation of higher-order defect clusters at higher mole% M203.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tuller, I. H.L. and Nowick, A.S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 122, 255– (1975).Google Scholar
2. Wang, D.Y., Pask, D.S., Griffith, J. and Nowick, A.S., Solid State Ionics 2, 95 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Andersion, M.P. and Nowick, A.S., J. Phys.(Paris) 42, C5823 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Wang, D.Y. and Nowick, A.S., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 44, 639 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Dreyfus, R.W. and Nowick, A.S., Physical Review 126, 1367 (1962).Google Scholar
6. Macedo, P.B., Moynihan, C.T. and Bose, R., Phys. Chem. Glasses 13, 171 (1972).Google Scholar
7. Ambrus, J.H., Moynihan, C.T. and Macedo, P.B., J. Phys. Chem. 76, 3287 (1972).Google Scholar
8. Provenzano, V., Boesch, L.P., Volterra, V., Moynihan, C.T. and Macedo, P.B., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 55, 492 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Moynihan, C.T., Boesch, L.P. and Laberge, N.L., Phys. Chem. Glasses 14, 122 (1973).Google Scholar
10. Howell, F.S., Bose, R.A., Macedo, P.B. and Moynihan, C.T., J. Phys. Chem. 78, 639 (1974).Google Scholar
11. Sundar, H.G.K., Liu, C. and Angell, C.A., Mat. Res. Bull. 22, 1533 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Sarkar, P. and Nicholson, P.S., Submitted to J. Phys. Chem. Solids.Google Scholar
13. Sarkar, P. and Nicholson, P.S., Solid State Ionics 21, 49 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Butlar, V., Catlow, C.R.A., Fender, B.E.F. and Harding, J.H., Solid State Ionics 8, 109 (1983).Google Scholar