Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T12:35:03.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Reactor Decontamination Complexing Agents on Soil Adsorption of Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. J. Serne ,
C. W. Lindenmeier ,
K. J. Cantrell  and
A. T. Owen
R. J. Serne
Affiliation:
Applied Geology and Geochemistry Section, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, jeffserne@pnl.gov
C. W. Lindenmeier
Affiliation:
Applied Geology and Geochemistry Section, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, jeffserne@pnl.gov
K. J. Cantrell
Affiliation:
Applied Geology and Geochemistry Section, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, jeffserne@pnl.gov
A. T. Owen
Affiliation:
Applied Geology and Geochemistry Section, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, jeffserne@pnl.gov
Get access

Abstract

The effects of picolinate, an organic ligand used to decontaminate nuclear reactor cooling systems, in leachates generated from shallow-land burial (SLB) of low-level nuclear wastes (LLW) on soil adsorption was determnined. Using batch adsorption tests and varying the concentration of picolinate, the adsorption tendencies of two metals [Ni(II) and U(VI)] and the ligand were measured as a function of solution pH. We found that when total metal concentrations were fixed at 10−5 M, picolinate at ligand-to-metal [L:M] ratios ≥10 did significantly reduce adsorption of Ni but even at a L:M ratio of 100 there was no effect on U(VI) adsorption. These results are compared with data on other metals in the presence of picolinate and for metal adsorption in the presence of EDTA. We conclude that picolinic acid is less of a threat than EDTA in waste leachates to reduce metal adsorption (increase mobility) and that picolinate concentrations must reach or exceed 10−4 M for the most impacted metals (i.e., those that form the very strongest complexes with picolinate). There are no leachate data on these decontamination agents for the common burial technique (disposal of de-watered resins in high integrity containers) that can be used to evaluate potential hazards of these organo-radionuclide complexes.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 1043
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Means, J. L., Crerar, D. A., and Duguid, J. O.. 1978. Science 200:1477–1482.Google Scholar
2. Means, J. L., and Alexander, C. A.. 1981. Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management 2:183–196.Google Scholar
3. O'Donnell, E. 1983. “Insights Gained from NRC Research Investigations at the Maxey Flats LLW SLB Facility.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Participants' Information Meeting DOE Low-Level Waste Management Program, pp. 254–268. CONF-8308106, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.Google Scholar
4. Polzer, W. L., Fowler, E. B., and Essington, E. H.. 1982. “Radioecology Studies at Maxey Flats, Kentucky: Radionuclides in Vegetal Samples.” In Radionuclide Distributions and Migration Mechanisms at Shallow Land Burial Sites, pp. V-1-24. NUREG/CR-2383, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
5. Dayal, R., Pietrzak, R. F., and Clinton, J. H.. 1986. Nucl. Tech. 72:184–193.Google Scholar
6. Mclsaac, E. V. 1993. Waste Management 13:41–54.Google Scholar
7. Mclsaac, E. V., and Mandler, J. W.. 1989. The Leachability of Decontamination Ion-Exchange Resins Solidified in Cement at Operating Nuclear Power Plants. NUREG/CR-5224, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
8. Mclsaac, E. V., Akers, D. W., and McConnell, J. W.. 1991. Effect ofpH on the Release of Radionuclides and Chelating Agents from Cement-Solidified Decontamination Ion-Exchange Resins Collectedfrom Operating Nuclear Power Stations. NUREG/CR-5601, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
9. Akers, D. W., Kraft, N. C., and Mandler, J. W.. 1994a. Release of Radionuclides and Chelating Agents From Cement-Solidified Decontamination Low-Level Radioactive Waste Collected From the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3. NUREG/CR-6164, EGG-2722, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
10. Akers, D. W., Kraft, N. C., and Mandler, J. W.. 1994b. Compression and Immersion Tests and Leaching of Radionuclides, Stable Metals, and Chelating Agents From Cement-Solidified Decontamination Waste Collected From Nuclear Power Stations. NUREG/CR-6201, EGG-2736, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
11. Shaw, R. A., and Wood, C. J.. 1985. “Chemical Decontamination: An Overview.” Nuclear News 6:107–111.Google Scholar
12. Smee, J. L., Bradbury, D., and LeSurf, J. E.. 1986. “Recent Experience with Dilute Chemical Decontamination.” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Advanced Nuclear Services, pp. 1–18. Toronto Nuclear Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
13. Swan, T., Segal, M. G., Williams, W. J., and Pick., M. E. 1987. LOMI Decontamination Reagents and Related Preoxidation Processes. EPRI NP-5522M, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California. 1048 Google Scholar
14. Speranzini, B. A., Voit, R., and Helms., M. 1990. “CAN-DECON Makes a Strong Comeback as CAN-DEREM.” Nuclear Engineering International 9:52–55.Google Scholar
15. Bradbury, D., Segal, M. G., Swan, T., Comley, G.C.W., and Ferrett, D. J.. 1981. “Decontamination of Winfrith SGHWR Coolant Circuits Using LOMI Reagents.” Nucl. Energy 20(5):403–408.Google Scholar
16. Serne, R. J., Felmy, A. R., Cantrell, K. J., Krupka, K. M., Campbell, J. A., Bolton, H. Jr., and Fredrickson, J. K.. 1996. Characterization of Radionuclide-Chelating Agent Complexes Found in Low-Level Radioactive Decontamination Waste. NUREG/CR-6124, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
17. R, Brina, and Miller, A.G.. 1992. Analytical Chemistry 64:1413–1417.Google Scholar
18. Davis, J. A., and Leckie, J. O.. 1978. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 67:90–107.Google Scholar
19. Serne, R. J. (in press).Google Scholar
20. Zachara, J. M., Smith, S. C., and Kuzel, L. S.. 1995a. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59:4825–4844.Google Scholar
21. Zachara, J. M., Gassman, P. L., Smith, S. C., and Taylor, D.. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59:4449–4463.Google Scholar