Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T09:34:33.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Nano-scale Colloidal Abrasive Particle Size on SiO2 by Chemical Mechanical Polishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Chunhong Zhou
Affiliation:
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
Lei Shan
Affiliation:
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
S.H. Ng
Affiliation:
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
Robert Hight
Affiliation:
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
Andrew. J. Paszkowski
Affiliation:
Chemical Products Corporation (dba Precision Colloids, LLC), Cartersville, GA 30120
S. Danyluk
Affiliation:
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports on the effect of colloidal abrasive particle size in the polishing of thermally grown silicon dioxide on 100mm diameter, P-type, (100), single crystal silicon wafers. The abrasive particle sizes were varied in six (6) slurries with pH values of 10.97 ± 0.08. The abrasive sizes were 10, 20, 50, 80, 110 and 140nm in diameter, and the slurry contained 30 weight percent abrasives. The experimental results indicate that the material removal rate (MRR) varies with the volume of the particle size. Results also confirm that there exists an optimum abrasive particle size with respect to material removal rate and surface finish. For a pad surface roughness of 5.2μm (Ra), the slurry containing 80nm particles resulted in the highest material removal rate and best surface finish. A nano-film model based on the pad roughness is used to explain the results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tomozawa, M., Solid State Technology, No.7, pp.169175, 1997.Google Scholar
2. Murarka, S.P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., V.566, pp.311, 2000.Google Scholar
3. Preston, F., Journal of the Society of Glass Technology, V.11, p.214, 1927.Google Scholar
4. Jairath, R., Desai, M., Stell, M., Tolles, R., and Scherber-Brewer, D., Mat. Res. Soc. Sy mp. Proc., V.337, pp.121131, 1994.10.1557/PROC-337-121Google Scholar
5. Xie, Y. and Bhushan, B., Wear, V.200, pp.281295, 1996.10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07275-4Google Scholar
6. Izumitani, T., Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by Tomozawa, M. and Doremus, R., Academic Press, V.17, p.115, 1979.Google Scholar
7. Bielmann, M., Mahajan, U., and Singh, R.K., Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, V.2, pp. 401403, 1999.Google Scholar
8. Cook, L.M., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, V.120, pp.152, 1990.10.1016/0022-3093(90)90200-6Google Scholar
9. Mahajan, U., Lee, S.M., and Singh, R.K., Proc. of the International Symp. on Chemical Mechanical Planarization in IC Device Manufacturing III, V.99–37, pp. 396401, 2000.Google Scholar
10. Koopman, D.C., WSRC-TR-2000-00239, Reversion 0, 2000.Google Scholar
11. Shan, L., Zhou, C., and Danyluk, S., IEEE Semiconductor Manufacturing, Accepted, 2001.Google Scholar
12. Hutchings, I.M., Tribology, Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials, CRC Press, pp.136142, 1992.Google Scholar
13. Greenwood, J. A. and Williamson, J. B. P., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A295, pp.300319, 1966.Google Scholar
14. Hamrock, B.J., Fundamentals of Fluid Film Lubrication, McGraw-Hill, p.141, 1994.Google Scholar