Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:18:37.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Conformational Diversity and Structural Dynamics on the Optical Properties of Diazoluminomelanin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Kim F. Ferris
Affiliation:
Materials Sciences Department, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
Steven M. Risser
Affiliation:
Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201
Katrina B. Wagner-Brown
Affiliation:
Conceptual Mindworks, Inc., San Antonio, TX 78228
Johnathan L. Kiel
Affiliation:
Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX 78235
Richard A. Albanese
Affiliation:
Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX 78235
Get access

Abstract

Diazoluminomelanin (DALM) is a luminescent polymer belonging to the broader class of conjugated polyphenylene materials, which has shown significant optical activity in response to perturbing fields. In this paper we use semiempirical electronic structure calculations and molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the molecular structure and absorption characteristics of model phenolic oligomers. Molecular dynamics simulations show the polymer backbone can be extremely flexible depending upon the ionization state of the phenolic hydroxyl groups. The interring torsion angle is a critical variable as it relates charge localization effects and electronic excitation energies. Comparison with experimental data demonstrates the need for a multistate basis to describe the absorption properties of this system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kiel, J., O'Brien, G., Dillon, J. and Wright, J., Free Rad. Res. Comms. 8, 115 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Kiel, J., Gabriel, C., Simmons, D., Erwin, D. and Grant, E., Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 12, 1689 (1990)Google Scholar
3. Kiel, J. L., Bruno, J. G. and Hurt, W. D., in Radiofrequency Standards, Ed. Klaunberg, B. J. et al. , Plenum Press, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
4. Bruno, J. and Kiel, J., Bioelectromagnetics 15, 315 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Bruno, J. and Kiel, J., in Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, Ed. Blank, M., San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1993.Google Scholar
6. Wright, R., unpublished work, Southeastern Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
7. Wagner, K.B., Ferris, K.F., Kiel, J.L. and Albanese, R.A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. (1997).Google Scholar
8. Wagner-Brown, K.B. and Ferris, K.F., J. Chem. Phys. Submitted.Google Scholar
9. Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy, E.F., and Stewart, J.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 3902 (1985).Google Scholar
10. MOPAC 97.00, Stewart, J.J.P., Fujitsu Limited, Tokyo, Japan (1998).Google Scholar
11. Kurtz, H.A., Stewart, J.J.P., and Dieter, K.M., J. Comp. Chem. 11, 82 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Dewar, M.J.S. and Dieter, K.M., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 108, 8075 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Gas Phase Ion Chemistry, Bowers, M.T., Ed., Academic Press, New York, Vol.2., 1979.Google Scholar
14. HyperChem 5.01, HyperCube Inc.,Waterloo, Canada (1996).Google Scholar
15. Cooper, J. and Kiel, J.L., private communication.Google Scholar
16. This electronic transition was found to be n-φ* by examination of the charge density differences between the initial and final states using the ZINDO/S Hamiltonian.Google Scholar