Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:52:56.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of A.C. Stress on Charge and Voltage Decay Rates of PZT Thin Film Capacitors for DRAM Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Rajesh B. Khamankar
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712
Jiyoung Kim
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712
Bo Jiang
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712
Jack Lee
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712
Get access

Abstract

A PZT thin film capacitor displays a reduction in the charge storage density (Qc') after the device has undergone pulsed electrical stress. This changes the charge-voltage relationship for the devices. The effect of this change in the Q-V relationship on the DRAM READ time is described. Measurements of the charge and voltage decay rates have been previously identified as ideal techniques for characterizing signal loss. For the first time the effects of electrical stress on these rates have been studied. While the charge decay rate decreases with an increase in the number of stress cycles for both the bipolar and unipolar stress, the voltage decay rate decreases after unipolar stress but it increases for bipolar stress at lower stress voltages. The implications of these results on the DRAM performance shall be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tasch, A.F., ECS Fall extended abstracts, 183, 236 (1993)Google Scholar
2. Duiker, H.M., Beale, P.D., Scott, J.F., Paz de Araujo, C.A., Melnick, B.M., dichiaro, J. D. and McMillan, L.D., J. Appl. Phys., 68(11), 5783 (1990)Google Scholar
3. YooandS, I.K.. Desu, s.P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 243, 323 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Sudhama, C., Khamankar, R., Kim, J., Jiang, B., Lee, J.C., Maniar, P.D., Moazzami, R., Jones, R.E. Jr, and Mogab, C.J., Proc. Int. Rel. Phys. Symp., p. 238 (1994)Google Scholar
5. Moazzami, R., Hu, Chenming and Shepherd, William H., Proc. Int. Rel. Phys. Symp., 231 (1990)Google Scholar
6. Jiang, Bo, Sudhama, C., Khamankar, Rajesh, Kim, Jiyoung and Lee, Jack C., Elec. Dev. Lett., 15(4), 126 (1994)Google Scholar