Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T02:10:36.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of the Transition Zone on the Bulk Modulus of Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Melanie P. Lutz
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science & Mineral Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Paulo J. M. Monteiro
Affiliation:
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

In concrete, non-uniformities in the hydration process, due to the the “wall effect” produeed by the aggregate (inclusion) particles, lead to an interfacial transition zone (ITZ) that is characterized by an increase in porosity near the inclusions. This increase in porosity may in turn be expected to cause a local decrease in the elastic moduli. We have modeled the effect of the ITZ by assuming that the elastic moduli vary smoothly in the vicinity of the inclusions, according to a power law. The exponent in the power law is chosen based on the estimated thickness of the ITZ. For this model, a closed-form expression can be found for the overall effective bulk modulus. The predicted bulk modulus of the concrete depends on known properties such as the elastic moduli of the bulk cement paste and the inclusions, the volume fraction of the inclusions, as well as on the elastic moduli at the interface. By comparing the model predictions to measured data, we can obtain estimates of the elastic moduli at the interface. Application of this inverse procedure to a set of data from the literature on mortar containing sand inclusions leads to the conclusion that the modulus at the interface is about 15-50% lower than in bulk cement paste.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mindess, S., in: Materials Science of Concrete, edited by Skalny, J. P. (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1989), pp. 163180.Google Scholar
2. Mehta, P. K. and Monteiro, P. J. M., Concrete: Structure, Properties, and Methods, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).Google Scholar
3. Nilsen, A. U. and Monteiro, P. J. M., Cement Concr. Res. 23, 147151 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Hirsch, T. J., J. Amer. Concrete Inst. 59, 427451 (1962).Google Scholar
5. Hashin, Z. and Shtrikman, S., J. Franklin Inst. 271, 336341 (1961).Google Scholar
6. Scrivener, K. L. and Gartner, E. M., in Bonding in Cementitious Composites, edited by Mindess, S. and Shah, S.P., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 114, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988) pp. 7785.Google Scholar
7. Kuster, G. T. and Toksöz, M. N., Geophysics 39, 587606 (1974).Google Scholar
8. Lutz, M. P. and Zimmerman, R. W., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
9. Theocaris, P. S., in: Composite Interfaces, edited by Ishida, H. and Koenig, J. L. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986), pp. 329345.Google Scholar
10. Mori, T. and Tanaka, K., Acta Metall. 21, 571574 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Zimmerman, R. W., King, M. S., and Monteiro, P. J. M., Cement Concr. Res. 16, 239245 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Zimmerman, R. W., Mech. Maters. 12, 1724 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Scrivener, K. L., in: Materials Science of Concrete, edited by Skalny, J. P. (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1989), pp. 127161.Google Scholar