Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:56:44.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Growth Conditions on the Reliability of Ultrathin MOS Gate Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Tien-Chun Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Krishna C. Saraswat
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

In this work we demonstrate that in MOS devices the reliability of ultrathin (< 100Å) gate oxide is a strong function of growth conditions, such as, temperature and the growth rate. In addition, for constant current gate injection the degradation of SiO2 is enhanced as the thickness is reduced. We attribute this to physical stress in SiO2 resulting from the growth process. The degradation is always more for those growth conditions which result in higher physical stress in SiO2. Higher temperatures and slower oxidation rates allow stress relaxation through viscous flow and hence result in SiO2 of better reliability. We also found that for constant current stressing, the interface damage is more at the collecting electrode than at the injecting electrode. ΔDit (stress induced interface state generation) can be reduced after a high temperature Ar post anneal after the gate oxide growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wolters, D. R., et al. ; Phillips J. Res, 40, 115, (1985).Google Scholar
2. Schugraf, K. F., et al. ; IEEE Trans.Electron Dev, 41, 1227, (1994).Google Scholar
3. Dumin, D., et al. ; IEEE Trans.Electron Dev, 42, 760, (1995).Google Scholar
4. Apte, P., et al. ; IEEE Trans.Electron Dev, 41, 1595, (1994).Google Scholar
5. DiMaria, D.J., et al. ; J. Appl. Phys. 73(7), 3367, April (1993).Google Scholar
6. Kao, Dah-Bin, Ph.D.thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University (1986).Google Scholar