Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:50:43.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Grain Boundary Chemistry on the Slip Transmission Process Through Grain Boundaries in Ni3Al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

I. M. Robertson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana II 61801.
T. C. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana II 61801.
Raja Subramanian
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana II 61801.
H. K. Birnbaum
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1304 W. Green St., Urbana II 61801.
Get access

Abstract

The conditions established in disordered FCC systems for predicting the slip system that will be activated by a grain boundary to relieve a local stress concentration have been applied to the ordered FCC alloy Ni3Al. The slip transfer behavior in hypo-stoichiometric Ni3Al with (0.2 at. %B) and without boron was directly observed by performing the deformation experiments in situ in the transmission electron microscope. In the boron-free and boron-doped alloys, lattice dislocations were incorporated in the grain boundary, but did not show evidence of dissociation to grain boundary dislocations or of movement in the grain boundary plane. The stress concentration associated with the dislocation pileup at the grain boundary was relieved by the emission of dislocations from the grain boundary in the boron-doped alloy. The slip system initiated in the adjoining grain obeyed the conditions established for disordered FCC systems. In the boron-free alloy, the primary stress relief mechanism was grain-boundary cracking, although dislocation emission from the grain boundary also occurred and accompanied intergranular crack advance. Because of the importance of the grain boundary chemistry in the models for explaining the boron-induced ductility in hypo-stoichiometric Ni3Al, the chemistry of grain boundaries in well-annealed boron-doped and boron-free alloys was determined by using EDS. No Ni enrichment was found at the grain boundaries examined. These observations are discussed in terms of the different models proposed to explain the ductility improvement in the boron-doped, hypo-stoichiometric alloy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bollmann, W., Michaut, B. and Sainfort, G., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 13, 637, (1972).Google Scholar
2. Bollmann, W., Crystal Defects and Crystalline Interfaces (New York, Springer), 1970.Google Scholar
3. Pond, R.C., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 357, 471, (1977).Google Scholar
4. Pond, R.C. and Smith, D.A., Phil. Mag., 36, 353, (1977).Google Scholar
5. Robertson, I.M., Bond, G.M., Lee, T.C., Shih, D.S. and Birnbaum, H. K., J. Physics Paris, C5–677 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Bond, G.M., Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K., J. Mat Research, 2, 436, (1987).Google Scholar
7. Lee, T.C., Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K., Scripta Metall., 23 799, (1989); J. of Ultramicroscopy, 22, 212, (1989); Phil. Mag., 62, 131, (1990) and Metall. Trans. A., 21A, 2437, (1990).Google Scholar
8. Lee, T. C., Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H. K., Acta Metall., 37, 407, (1988).Google Scholar
9. Lee, T.C., Robertson, I. M. and Birnbaum, H.K., Acta Metall., Submitted.Google Scholar
10. Shen, Z., Wagoner, R.H. and Clark, W. A. T., Scripta Metall., 20, 921, (1986).Google Scholar
11. CForwood, T. and Clarebrough, L.M., Phil. Mag. 44, 31, (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lim, L. C., Scripta Metall., 18, 1139, (1984).Google Scholar
13. Kurdlowski, K.J., Varin, R.A., and Zielinski, W., Acta Metall., 22, 71, (1984).Google Scholar
14. Shen, Z., Wagoner, R.H. and Clark, W. A. T., Scripta Metall., 36, 3231, (1988).Google Scholar
15. Livingston, J.D. and Chalmers, B., Acta Metall., 5, 322, (1957).Google Scholar
16. Lim, L.C. and Raj, R., J. Physics, Paris, C4–581 (1985).Google Scholar
17. The alloys were obtained from DrKroeger, D., ORNL.Google Scholar
18. Baker, I., Schulson, E.M. and Michael, J.R., Phil. Mag. B. 57, 379,(1988).Google Scholar
19. Farkas, D., Lewus, M.O., and Rangarajan, V., Scripta Metallurgica, 22, 1195, (1988).Google Scholar
20. Edington, J.W.. Practical Electron Microscopy in Materials Science. Monograph 2, Macmillan Press, London 1975.Google Scholar
21. Subramanian, Raja, Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K., Scripta Metall, et Mat., 25, 2763, (1991).Google Scholar
22. George, E.P., Liu, C.T. and Padgett, R.A., Scripta Metall., 23, 979, (1989).Google Scholar
23. Schulson, E.M., Weihs, T.P., Baker, I., Frost, H.J. and Horton, J.A.. Acta Metall., 34, 1395 (1986).Google Scholar
24. Baker, I., Schulson, E.M. and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall., 25, 1533, (1987).Google Scholar
25. Baker, I. and Schulson, E.M., Scripta Metall., 23, 1883, (1989).Google Scholar
26. Schulson, E.M. and Baker, I., Scripta Metall, et Mater., 25, 1253, (1991).Google Scholar
27. Schulson, E.M., Weihs, T.P., Viens, D.V. and Baker, I., Acta Metall., 33, 1587, (1985).Google Scholar
28. Khadkikar, P.S., Vedula, K. and Shabel, B.S., Met Trans A, 28A, 425, (1987).Google Scholar
29. Baker, I., Schulson, E.M., Michael, J.R. and Pennycook, S. J., Phil. Mag. B., 62, 659, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., J. Japan Inst. Metals, 43, 1190, (1979).Google Scholar
31. Subramanian, Raja, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, 1991.Google Scholar
32. Strotk, W., Wendt, H., Carter, C. B. and Kohlstedt, D.L., Acta Metall., 36, 983, (1988).Google Scholar
33. Baker, I., Huang, B. and Schulson, E.M., Acta Metall., 21, 493, (1988).Google Scholar
34. Yan, W., Jones, I. P. and Smallman, R. E., Scripta Metall., 21, 1511, (1987).Google Scholar
35. Mackenzie, R.A. D., Vaudin, M.D. and Sass, S.L., Proc. MRS, 122, 461, (1988).Google Scholar
36. Swiatnicki, W.A. and Grabski, M.W., Acta Metall., 21, 1307, (1989).Google Scholar
37. Rice, J.R., in The Effect of Hydrogen on the Behavior of Metals. 455, AIME, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
38. Lui, C.T., White, C.L. and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall., 33, 213, (1985).Google Scholar
39. Miller, M.K. and Horton, J. A., J. de Phys., C7, 263, (1986).Google Scholar
40. Chen, S. P. Voter, A.F. and Srolovitz, D. J., Scripta Metall., 20, 1389, (1986).Google Scholar
41. Chen, S.P., Voter, A.F., Albers, R.C., Boring, A.M. and Hay, P.J., J. Mater. Res., 5, 955, (1990).Google Scholar
42. Vitek, V. and Chen, S. P., Scripta Metall, et Mat., 25, 1237, (1991).Google Scholar
43. Bond, G.M., Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K., Acta Metall., 37, 1407, (1989).Google Scholar