Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:59:17.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Adsorbeb Oxygen Ions on the Inelastic Scattering of Photo-Electrons at the Metal-Vacuum Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Z. X. He
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Hawaii, HI 96822
W. Imaino
Affiliation:
IBM Research Laboratory, San Jose, CA 95193
Get access

Abstract

Measurements of uv photoemission from evaporated aluminum films were made at photon energies 7.7–11 eV as a function of time after film deposition. Evidence of the initial stage of chemisorption of oxygen can be seen in the uv photoelectron spectra. The spectra taken immediately after film deposition showed a smooth energy distribution characteristic of clean aluminum. Structure in the spectra was found to appear at approximately 60 minutes after deposition at 10−9 Torr. Three noticeable features were observed at 1.0, 1.3, and 2.5 eV above the vacuum level. They appeared stationary with increasing photon energy. The structure can be attributed to inelastic scattering of photoelectrons into resonant states associated with oxygen ions on the metal surface. The energy levels of the calculated resonant states of a helium-like system are compared with the energy of the observed structure. The agreement suggests that there are adsorbed 0 ions to which photoelectrons can be scattered at the metal-vacuum interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Morrison, S. R., The Chemical Physics of Surfaces (Plenum Press, New York, 1977).10.1007/978-1-4615-8007-2Google Scholar
2. Satoko, C., Chem. Phys. Lett. 83, 111 (1981).10.1016/0009-2614(81)80300-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Satoko, C., Phys. Rev. B 30, 1754 (1984).10.1103/PhysRevB.30.1754Google Scholar
4. Batra, I. P. and Kleinman, L., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 33, 175 (1984).10.1016/0368-2048(84)80020-1Google Scholar
5. Madden, R. P. and Codling, K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 516 (1963).10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Yu, K. Y., Miller, J. N., Chye, P., Spicer, W. E., Lang, N. D., and Williams, A. R., Phys. Rev. B 14, 1446 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.14.1446Google Scholar
7. Lang, N. D. and Williams, A. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 531 (1975).10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.531Google Scholar
8. Sommer, A. H., Photoemissive Materials (Wiley, NewYork, 1968).Google Scholar
9. Gasiorowicz, S., Quantum Physics (Wiley, New York, 1974).Google Scholar