Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T13:53:52.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of MEMS Microengines Using Optoelectronic Laser Interferometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

G. C. Brown
Affiliation:
Center for Holographic Studies and Laser micro-mechaTronics, Mechanical Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, gcbrown@wpi.edu
R. J. Pryputniewicz
Affiliation:
Center for Holographic Studies and Laser micro-mechaTronics, Mechanical Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, gcbrown@wpi.edu
M. P. De Boer
Affiliation:
Intelligent Micromachine Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, http:\\www.mems.sandia.gov
Norman Smith
Affiliation:
Intelligent Micromachine Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, http:\\www.mems.sandia.gov
Get access

Abstract

We have developed an optoelectronic laser interferometry microscope (OLIM) methodology for rapid characterization of MEMS' motion dynamics. In this study, electrostatic comb drive actuated microengines comprised of a 64 μm diameter drive gear and a 300 μm output gear (load gear) were characterized dynamically. Two different input signals were used: 1) a four-step square wave input and 2) an optimized input signal calculated from an analytical model. Out-ofplane motion on rotating microgears was measured as a function of the input signals. The outof-plane motions for the drive during the four-step input ranged from zero to ±462 nm and from zero to ±514 nm for the drive and output gears, respectively. For the optimum input, the out-ofplane motions ranged from zero to ±1030 nm for the drive gear. However, for the output gear the tilt magnitudes were nearly constant at ±514 rum, and were independent of angular position. The more constant out-of-plane motions of the load gear for the optimized signal are due to improved kinematics and kinetics leading to more continuous rather than impulsive forces (e. g., frictional, inertial) acting on the output gear.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Garcia, E. J. and Sniegowski, J. J., “Surface micromachined microengine,” Sensors and Actuators A, 48:203214 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Sniegowski, J. J. and Garcia, E. J., “Microfabricated actuators and their applications in optics,” Proc. SPIE, SPIE: Miniaturized systems with micro-optics and micromechanics, 2383:4664 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Brown, G. C., Laser interferometric methodolgies for characterizing static and dynamic behavior of Micro ElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS), Ph.D. Dissertation, CHSLT- Center for Holographic Studies and Laser micro-mechaTronics, Mechanical Engineering Department, WPI, Worcester, MA (1999).Google Scholar
4. Allen, J. J., Miller, S. L., LaVigne, G. F., Rodgers, M. S., and Eaton, W. P., “Dynamic effects of linkage joints in electrostatic microengines,” Proc. Modeling and simulation of microsystems, MSM98, SNL, Santa Clara, CA (1998).Google Scholar
5. Furlong, C., Hybrid, computational and experimental, approach for the efficient study and optimization of mechanical and electro-mechanical components, Ph.D. Dissertation, CHSLT- Center for Holographic Studies and Laser micro-mechaTronics, Mechanical Engineering Department, WPI, Worcester, MA (1999).Google Scholar
6. Kreis, T., Holographic interferometry, principles and methods, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, (1996).Google Scholar
7. Takeda, M., Ina, H., and Koayashi, S., “Fourier transform method of fringe pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry,J. Opt. Soc. Am., 72:156160 (1982).Google Scholar