Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:26:04.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doping process issues for Sub-0.1 μm generation MOSFETs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Toshihiro Sugii
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197, Japan
Sergey Pidin
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197, Japan
Youichi Momiyama
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197, Japan
Ken- ichi Goto
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197, Japan
Takuji Tanaka
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197, Japan
Tomonari Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197, Japan
Toshirou Futatugi
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-0197, Japan
Masatak Kase
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Ltd., 1500, Mizono, Tado-cho, Kuwana-gun, Mie 511-0192, Japan
Get access

Abstract

To meet the market demands for higher performance LSIs, traditional scaling has been aggressively pursued and has enjoyed great success over the 0.1-μm generations. To maintain continued growth of CMOS performance beyond the 0.1-μm generation, key issues originating from traditional scaling are addressed from the viewpoint of the doping processes (channel engineering, high-activation, and gate- electrode structure) in this paper.

To meet the acceleration in gate-length miniaturization, short-channel effects must be suppressed at a low threshold voltage by using aggressive channel engineering. A channel-impurity profile must be optimized two-dimensionally, not uniformly or one-dimensionally. Channel engineering using tilted-channel implantation (TCI) with Indium is demonstrated.

Traditional scaling results in large variations of threshold voltage due to the statistical-impurity variation in a channel region. We studied the effect of the above channel engineering on threshold voltage fluctuation caused by a statistical- dopant variation by measurement and simulation. It is reported that the two-dimensionally optimized channel profile enhances threshold-voltage fluctuation even if the implantation process variation is negligible.

As CMOS device scales, reduction of parasitic resistance becomes very important for a high performance operation. Resistance at extension egde and contact resistance at silicide-Si interface are dominant factors.The traditional approach is to use a higher RTA temperature and a shorter RTA time. The ultimate RTA is laser annealing. We will demonstrate the laser annealing process with an ultra-low contact resistance of 4 × 10−8 Ω-cm2.

By integrating the above technologies, ultra-thin gate insulators, and reduction in gate to source/drain overlap length, we can establish front-end process for sub-0.1 μm generations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Semiconductor Industry Association National and International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, 1994, 1997, and 1999.Google Scholar
2. Sugii, T., Momiyama, Y., Deura, M., and Goto, K., Abs. Silicon Nanoelectronics Workshop, p. 60 (1999)Google Scholar
3. Kurata, H. and Sugii, T., IEEE Trans. on EDL, 45, 2161 (1998)Google Scholar
4. Momiyama, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Ohkubo, S., and Sugii, T., Technical paper of VLSI Symp. on Tech., p.67 (1999)Google Scholar
5. Assaderaghi, F. et al., IEDM Tech. Dig., p. 809 (1994)Google Scholar
6. Momiyama, Y., Hirose, T., Kurata, H., Goto, K., Watanabe, Y., and Sugii, T., IEDM Tech. Dig., p. 451 (2000)Google Scholar
7. Wong, H.-S. and Taur, Y., IEDM Tech. Dig. p. 705 (1993)Google Scholar
8. Mizuno, T. and Toriumi, A., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 3538 (1995)Google Scholar
9. Tanaka, T., Usuki, T., Momiyama, Y., and Sugii, T., Technical paper of VLSI Symp. on Tech., p. 136 (2000)Google Scholar
10. Tanaka, T., Usuki, T., Futatsugi, T., Momiyama, Y., and Sugii, T., IEDM Tech. Dig. p. 271 (2000)Google Scholar
11. Goto, K., Yamamoto, T., Kubo, T., Kase, M., Wang, Y., Lin, T., Talwar, S., and Sugii, T., IEDM Tech. Dig. p. 931 (1999)Google Scholar
12. Goto, K., Kase, M., Momiyama, Y., Kurata, H., Tanaka, T., Deura, M., Sanbonsugi, Y., and Sugii, T., IEDM Tech. Dig., p. 631 (1998)Google Scholar
13. Yu, B., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Riccobene, C., Talwar, S., and Lin, M-R., IEDM Tech. Dig. p. 509 (1999)Google Scholar
14. Ghani, T., et al., IEDM Tech. Dig., p. 415 (1999)sGoogle Scholar
15. Ono, A., Fukasaku, K., Matsuda, T., Fukai, T., Ikezawa, N., Imai, K., and Horiuchi, T., Technical paper of VLSI Symp. on Tech., p. 136 (2000)Google Scholar