Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T19:57:27.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusion Characteristics of Vacancies in Aluminum Interconnects.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

A. S. Nandedkar
A. S. Nandedkar*
Affiliation:
Technology Modeling Department, IBM, East Fishkill Laboratory, Z/47C, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Computer simulations were performed to investigate the migration energy of vacancies in A1 in the presence of grain boundary, dislocation and various imposed forces (such as stress gradients and electro-migration). The energy values were significantly smaller when the vacancy moved into the grain boundary or a dislocation core than in opposite direction. This makes these defects sinks for vacancies from which they are unlikely to migrate out. The major time required for the movement of vacancies is thus limited to within a single grain. Calculations of migration time from the center of the grain to the grain boundary gives time needed for void formation. Calculations of this time assuming an electrical potential gradient along the metal line gave estimates consistent with experimental observations. The increased values of migration energy under compressive stresses suggest that void formation could be deterred by applying such stresses.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 291: Symposium O – Materials Theory and Modeling , 1992 , 361
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nandedkar, A. S., Srinivasan, G. R., Estabil, J. J., and Domenicucci, A., To be published in Phil. Mag. A. Google Scholar
2. Gupta, Devendra, in Diffusion Phenomena in Thin Films and Microelectronic Materials. edited by Gupta, Devendra and Ho, P. S. (Noyes Publications, New Jersey, U. S. A., 1988), P. 1.Google Scholar
3. Sullivan, T. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2399 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Li, C. Y., Black, R. D. and LaFontaine, W. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 31 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Borgesen, P., Lee, J. K., Paszkiet, C. A., and Lee, C. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1341 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Yost, F. G. and Campbell, F. E., Circuits and Devices, 40 May (1990).Google Scholar
7. Smith, U., Kristensen, N., Ericson, F., and Schweitz, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 9, 2527 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Smith, W. L., Welles, C., Bivas, A., Yost, F. G., and Campbell, J. E., Proceedings of the 28th Annual Reliability Physics Symposium (New York: IEEE), 200 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Tanikawa, A., Okabayashi, H., Mori, H., and Fujita, H., Proceedings of the 28th Annual Reliability Symposium (New York: IEEE), 209 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Kwok, T. and Ho, P. S., in Diffusion Phenomena in Thin Films and Microclectronic Materials, edited by Gupta, Devendra and Ho, P. S. (Noyes Publications, New Jersey, U. S. A., 1988), P. 369.Google Scholar
11. Faupel, F., Phil. Mag. A 65, 1287 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Bokstein, B. S., Fradkov, V. E. and Beke, D. L., Phil. Mag. A, 65, 277 (1992).Google Scholar
13. Knight, D. T. and Burton, B., Phil. Mag. A, 66, 289 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Halicioglu, T. and Pound, G. M., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 30, 619 (1975).Google Scholar
15. Johnson, R. A., Phys. Rev. 145, 423 (1966).Google Scholar
16. Nandedkar, A. S., To be published.Google Scholar
17. Narayan, J. and Nandedkar, A. S., Phil. Mag. A 63, 1181 (1991).Google Scholar
18. Barnes, R. S. and Mazey, D. J., Acta Metallurgica 6, 1 (1958).Google Scholar