Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T12:04:11.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of Integrated Mechanistically-Based Degradation-Mode Models for Performance Assessment of High-Level Waste Containers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. C. Farmer ,
R. D. Mccright ,
J. C. Estill  and
S. R. Gordon
J. C. Farmer
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
R. D. Mccright
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
J. C. Estill
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
S. R. Gordon
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
Get access

Abstract

Alloy 22 [UNS N06022] is now being considered for construction of high level waste containers to be emplaced at Yucca Mountain and elsewhere. In essence, this alloy is 20.0–22.5% Cr, 12.5–14.5% Mo, 2.0–6.0% Fe, 2.5–3.5% W, with the balance being Ni. Other impurity elements include P, Si, S, Mn, Co and V. Cobalt may be present at a maximum concentration of 2.5%. Detailed mechanistic models have been developed to account for the corrosion of Alloy 22 surfaces in crevices that will inevitably form. Such occluded areas experience substantial decreases in pH, with corresponding elevations in chloride concentration. Experimental work has been undertaken to validate the crevice corrosion model, including parallel studies with 304 stainless steel.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 855
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Oldfield, J. W., Sutton, W. H., Brit. Corr. J. 13 (1), 13–22 (1978).Google Scholar
2. Nystrom, E. A., Lee, J. B., Sagues, A. A., Pickering, H. W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (2), 358–361 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Walton, J. C., Cragnolino, G., Kalandros, S. K., Corr. Sci. 38 (1), 1996, 1–18 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Farmer, J. C., McCright, R. D., Paper No. 98160, Corrosion 98 (San Diego, CA, March 22-27, 1998, NACE, Houston, TX); UCRL-ID-127980, Parts 1 & 2 (1997, LLNL, Livermore, CA).Google Scholar
5. Farmer, J.C., Bedrossian, P. J., McCright, R. Daniel, Spectrum 98, Vol.1 (Denver, CO, Sept. 13-18, 1998, ANS, La Grange Park, IL) pp. 610–623.Google Scholar
6. Gruss, K. A., Dunn, D. S., Cragnolino, G. A., Sridar, N., Paper No. 98149, Corrosion 98 (San Diego, CA March 22-27, 1998, NACE, Houston, TX).Google Scholar
7. Haynes International, Inc., Product Brochure H-2002B (1987).Google Scholar
8. Asphahani, A. I., Materials Performance 19 (12), 33–43 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Farmer, J. C., ICONE-6 (San Diego, CA, May 10-15, 1998, ASME).Google Scholar
10. Sedriks, A. J., Corrosion of Stainless Steels, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, NY, 1996) p. 179.Google Scholar
11. Bogar, F. D., Fujii, C. T., NRL Report 7690 (Naval Research Laboratory, 1974).Google Scholar
12. Sridhar, N., Dunn, D. S., Corrosion, 50 (11), 857–872 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Pourbaix, M., Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, English Translation, Franklin, J. A. (Pergamon Press, New York, NY; Cebelcor, Brussels, Belgium, 1966) p. 644.Google Scholar