Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:11:22.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Designing Pore-Size in Silica Gels: [H2O] – [TMOS] System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

H. Kido
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
P. B. Malla
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
S. Komarneni
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

A series of microporous silica gels were synthesized by hydrolyzing tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS) with varying amounts of water. No catalyst or alcohal was added. The gels were characterized by water sorption isotherms, the BET nitrogen surface area measurements, and differential thermal analysis. Although the gelation time for all H2O/TMOS molar ratios (R) was approximately the same (about 3 hr), the pore-size (pore diameter) and sorption capacity were found to be minimum in the R range 4.96–5.37 but increased with both increasing and decreasing R. Water sorption isotherms measured at 25°C after degassing at 200°C of gels prepared with R = 4.96–5.37 exhibited moderate Type I (Brunauer classification) isotherm which changed to intermediate between Type I and Type IV with decreasing or increasing R. These results indicated that the amount of organic or water which was not utilized in the reaction and the degree of cross-linking apparently played a role for the observed variations in pore-size or shape of water isotherms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shafer, M.W., Awschalom, D.D., and Warnock, J., J. Appl. Phys. 61(12), 5438 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Chan, J-B., Hua, D-W., Winter, R., and Jonas, J., J. Mater. Res. Soc. 4 (3), 693 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Colier, R.K., Cole, T.S., and Lavan, Z., ”Advanced Desiccation Materials Assessment-Final Report.” Gas Research Institute, Contract 5084-243-1089 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Yamanaka, S. and Komarneni, S., U.S. Patent (filed) (1988).Google Scholar
5. Hagymassy, J. Jr., Brunauer, S., and Mikhail, R. Sh., J. colloid & Interface Sci. 29 (3) 485 (1969).Google Scholar
6. Hagymassy, J. and Brunauer, S., J. Colloid & Interface Sci. 33 (2), 317 (1970).Google Scholar
7. Avnir, D. and Kaufman, V.R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 192. 180 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Malla, P. B., Yamanaka, S. and Komarneni, S., Solid State Ionics 233, 354 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Dubinin, M.M., in Progress in Surface & Membrane Sci., edited by Danielli, J.F., Rosenberg, M.D., and Cadenhead, D.A. (Academic Press, New York, 1975) 9, 170.Google Scholar
10. Sing, K.S.W., in Colloid Science, edited by Everett, D.H. (The Chemical Society, London, 1973) 1, 148.Google Scholar
11. Everett, D.H. and Powl, J.C., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I, 72. 619 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Sakka, S. and Komiya, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 48, 31(1982).Google Scholar
13. Keefer, K.D., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry, edited by Bringer, C.J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 32, Pittsburg, PA 1984) pp. 15-24Google Scholar
14. Klein, L. C. and Garvey, G.J., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry, edited by Brinker, C. J., Clark, D.E., and Ulrich, D.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 32. Pittsburg, PA 1984) pp. 3339.Google Scholar