Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T04:46:24.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and evaluation of restoration mortars for historic masonry using traditional materials and production techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Antonia Moropoulou
Affiliation:
Section of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St., Zografou, Athens, Greece
Asterios Bakolas
Affiliation:
Section of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St., Zografou, Athens, Greece
Petros Moundoulas
Affiliation:
Section of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St., Zografou, Athens, Greece
Eleni Aggelakopoulou
Affiliation:
Section of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St., Zografou, Athens, Greece
Sofia Anagnostopoulou
Affiliation:
Section of Materials Science and Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Iroon Polytechniou St., Zografou, Athens, Greece
Get access

Abstract

Cement based mortars used for historic masonry restoration presented unsatisfactory results, due to their chemical and physico-mechanical incompatibility to original buildings. In the present research, several syntheses of restoration mortars are produced using traditional techniques and materials such as binders (aerial and natural hydraulic lime), pozzolanicadditives (natural and artificial pozzolanas) and aggregates (sand and crushed brick). The technical characteristics of the mortars were determined using mechanical tests (compressive and flexural) and mercury intrusion porosimetry measurements at the time of 1, 3, 9, 15 months of curing. Water absorption measurements were performed at the time of 9 and 15 months curing, in order to evaluate mortars microstructural characteristics, their rate of water absorption and the total percentage of absorbed water. The aerial lime - artificial pozzolana mortar presented the best mechanical and microstructural performance. Hydraulic mortars acquired the maximum of the mechanical strength in 1 month, lime - pozzolana mortars in 3 months while aerial lime mortars continue to gain mechanical strength even in 15 months curing. Furthermore, the use of ceramic aggregates produces lightweight and elastic mortars, compatible to historicones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vitruvius, M.P., The Ten Books on Architecture, Morgan, M.H. Trans., Dover Publications, New York, 1960 Google Scholar
2. , Fassina, Borsela, S., The Effects of Past Treatments on the Accelaration of Weathering Processes in the Statues of Prato Della Valle, Intern. UNESCO-RILEM Congress on the Conservation of Stone and other Materials, Paris, 1993, Proc. pp. 129 Google Scholar
3. Skoulikidis, Th., Critique on the old materials of consolidation and protection for monuments surfaces, Special Edition of NTUA for Energy, Athens, 1998 Google Scholar
4. Tutonico, J.M., McCaig, I., Burns, C., Ashurst, J., The Smeaton Project AC1, Phase 1 Report. English Heritage, 1994 Google Scholar
5. Moropoulou, A., 2000, “Reverse engineering to reveal traditional technologies: A properapproach for compatible restoration mortar”, PACT, Journal of the European Study group on Physical, Chemical, Biological and Mathematical Techniques Applied to Archaeology, Vol. 58, 81108 Google Scholar
6. Moropoulou, A., Cakmak, A.S. G, A.S Biscontin, G., 1996, “Crushed brick lime mortars of Justinian's Hagia Sophia”, Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology V, ed. by Druzik, J. R. and Vandiver, P. B., Materials Research Society, pp. 317322 Google Scholar
7. Moropoulou, A., Bakolas, A., Range of Acceptability limits of Physical, Chemical and Mechanical Characteristics deriving from the Evaluation of Historic Mortars, Compatible Materials for the Restoration of European Cultural Heritage, Pact, 56 (1998) 165178 Google Scholar
8. Moropoulou, A., Bakolas, A., Aggelakopoulou, E., “The effects of limestone characteristics and calcination temperature to the reactivity of quicklimeJ. Cement and Concrete Research 31 (2001) pp.633639 Google Scholar