Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:12:32.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deposition of Conductive Titanium Sub-Oxide Films by Reactive Ion-Beam Sputtering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

K.G. Grigorov
Affiliation:
Institut d’Electronique Fondamentale, CNRS URA 0022, Bât. 220, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
A.H. Benhocine
Affiliation:
Institut d’Electronique Fondamentale, CNRS URA 0022, Bât. 220, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
D. Bouchier
Affiliation:
Institut d’Electronique Fondamentale, CNRS URA 0022, Bât. 220, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
F. Meyer
Affiliation:
Institut d’Electronique Fondamentale, CNRS URA 0022, Bât. 220, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

Titanium monoxide films were deposited on silicon by reactive ion beam sputtering from a Ti target. The film composition was measured in situ by Auger electron spectrometry. It was observed that oxygen content in the deposit does not depend on the substrate temperature, up to 600 °C. Synthesized TiO films had a cubic structure with a lattice parameter of 4.17 Å, which confirmed that the O/Ti concentration ratio in the films was very close to the expected value. The films were found to be conductive, with a resistivity value equal to 170 μΩ cm. They had a yellowish metallic appearence and a very smooth surface. Sequences of annealings at increasing temperatures were performed under ultra-high-vacuum. No AES signal from silicon was observed up to a temperature of 700 °C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Si, J., and Desu, S.B., J. Mater. Res. 8 (10), 2642 (1993)Google Scholar
2 Green, M.L., Gross, M.E., Papa, L.E., Schnoes, K.J., and Brasen, D., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (11), 2677 (1985).Google Scholar
3 Harper, J.M.E., Hörnström, S.E., Thomas, O., Charai, A., and Krusin-Elbaum, L., J. Vac. Sci Technol. A7 (3) 875 (1989)Google Scholar
4 Quenisset, C., and Naslain, R., Surf. Interface Anal. 13, 130 (1988).Google Scholar
5 Ramesh, R., Chan, W.K., Wilkens, B., Gilchrist, T., Sands, T., Tarascon, J.M., and Keramidas, V.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 (13), 1537 (1992)Google Scholar
6 Ameen, M.S., Graettinger, T.M., Rou, S.H., Al-Shareef, H.N., Gifford, K.D., Auciello, O., and Kingon, A.I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 200, 65 (1990).Google Scholar
7 Bosseboeuf, A., and Bouchier, D., Surf. Sci. 162, 695 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Sherwood, P.M.A., in : Practical Surface Analysis, edited by Briggs, D. and M.P, Seah (Wiley &Sons, New York, 1983) 449 Google Scholar
9 Solomon, J.S. and Baun, W.L., Surf. Sci. 51, 228 (1975).Google Scholar
10 Fischer, D.W., Phys. Rev. B5 , 4219 (1972).Google Scholar
11 Fromm, E., Duppel, H., and Bauder, U., Thin Solid Films 33, 323 (1976).Google Scholar
12 Hrbek, J., Thin Solid Films 42, 185 (1977).Google Scholar
13 Ehrlich, Z. Elektrochem. 45, 363 (1939)Google Scholar
14 Pagnod, P., Thesis, Université de Paris XI, Orsay (1990).Google Scholar