Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T08:37:13.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creep Behavior of Spuitered TiN Films Using Indentation Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

V. Raman  and
R. Berriche
V. Raman
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, General Products Division, San Jose, CA 95193.
R. Berriche
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Get access

Abstract

Tin films were deposited on silicon substrates by RF diode sputtering and the growth behavior of these films were characterized by scanning electron microscopy. The time dependent plastic flow behavior in these films were examined by performing indentation tests using a dcpth-scnsing hardness testing machine. Individual indentation experiments with different constant load segments were conducted and the creep characteristics of both sputtered films and bulk Sn were examined. The stress exponents determined from these tests were compared with those determined for bulk Sn from conventional creep tests. The influence of the substrate material on the creep properties of the film are described.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 188: Symposium K – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties II , 1990 , 171
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pethica, J., Flutchings, R. and Oliver, W.C., Phil. Mag. A 48, 593 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Wu, T.W., Burn, R.A., Chen, M.M. and Alexopoulos, P.S., Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties, edited by Bravman, J.C., Nix, W.D., Barnett, D.M. and Smith, D.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 130, Pittsburgh, Pa 1989 ) pp. 117–122.Google Scholar
4. Sherby, O.D. and Burke, P.M., Prog. Mater. Sci. 13, 323 (1968).Google Scholar
5. Mayo, M.J. and Nix, W.D., Strength of Metals and Alloys, edited by Kettunen, P.O., Lepisto, T.K. and Lehtonen, M.E. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1988 ) pp.1415–1420.Google Scholar
6. Stone, S-P Itannula D. and Li, C-Y, Electronic Packaging Materials Science, edited by Giess, E.A., Tu, K.-N. and Uhlmatm, D.R (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 40, Pittsburgh, Pa 1985 ) pp. 217–224.Google Scholar
7. Weertman, J., J. Appl. Phys. 28, 196 (1957).Google Scholar
8..Weertman, J. and Breen, J.E., J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1189 (1956).Google Scholar
9. Mohammed, F.A., Murty, K.L. and Morris, J.W., Met. Trans. 4, 935 (1973).Google Scholar
10. Chu, S.N.G. and Li, J.C.M., Mater. Sci. Eng. 39, 1 (1979).Google Scholar
11. Li, J.C.M. and Chu, S.N.G., Scripta Metall. 13, 1021 (1979).Google Scholar
12. Raman, V., Unpublished work, (1990).Google Scholar
13. Konetzki, R.A. and Chang, Y.A., J. Mater. Res. 3, 466 (1988).Google Scholar