Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T22:08:10.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crack Propagation in MG-PSZ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

M. J. Readey
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
A. H. Heuer
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
R. W. Steinbrech
Affiliation:
University Dortmund, Dortmund, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Abstract

Certain coarse-grained Mg-PSZ's exhibit marked R-curve behavior, e.g., the crack resistance increases from ∼5 to ∼15 MPam1/2 with the first 500 microns of crack extension. These high toughness materials also show unusually-good flaw tolerance.

Crack propagation and crack path development in Mg-PSZ were investigated during stable crack growth using a modified DCB specimen geometry. Crack extension was monitored with a traveling microscope equipped with a video recording system. PSZ's with various heat-treatments were tested to determine the effect of microstructure on R-curve behavior.

Cracks were found to propagate discontinuously and to arrest. Smaller microcracks would develop around the arrested crack, and link together to form the macrocrack which led to eventual failure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Burns, S.J., Swain, M.V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 22 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Marshall, D.B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 173 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Readey, M.J., Heuer, A.H., Steinbrech, R.W., unpublished work.Google Scholar
4. Readey, M.J., Steinbrech, R.W., Heuer, A.H., “Influence of Microstructure on R-Curve Behavior in Mg-PSZ”, presented at the 88th Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic Society, Chicago, Il April 30, 1986.Google Scholar
5. Knehans, R., Steinbrech, R.W., J. Mat. Sci. Letters 1 327 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Cook, R.F., Lawn, B.R., and Fairbanks, C.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68 604 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Heuer, A.H., submitted, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.Google Scholar
8. Porter, D.L., Heuer, A.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 62 298 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Hannink, R.H.J. and Swain, M.V., J. Aust. Ceram. Soc 18 53 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Hannink, R.H.J., and Garvie, R.C., J. Mater. Sci. 17 2637 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Hannink, R.H.J., J. Mater. Sci. 18 457 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Broek, D., Elementary Fracture Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston, 1982).Google Scholar
13. Wiederhorn, S.M., in Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol.2, edited by R.C., Bradt, D.P.H., Hasselman and F.F., Lange, Plenum Press, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
14. Bathena, N., Hoagland, R.G., and Meyrick, G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 799 (1984).Google Scholar
15. Steinbrech, R.W. and Deuerler, F., to be published.Google Scholar
16. Trantina, G.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 60 338 (1977).Google Scholar
17. Atkins, A.G. and Mai, Y.W., Elastic and Plastic Fracture, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985), pp. 198204.Google Scholar
18. McMeeking, R., Evans, A.G., J. Am Ceram. Soc. 65 242 (1982).Google Scholar
19. Readey, M.J., Heuer, A.H., unpublished work.Google Scholar
20. Chaim, R. and Brandon, D.G., J. Mater. Sci. 19 2934 (1984).Google Scholar
21. Drennan, J., Hannink, R.H.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 541 (1986).Google Scholar
22. Farmer, S., Heuer, A.H., and Hannink, R,H,J, in press.Google Scholar
23. Swain, M.V. and Hannink, R.H.J., Advances in Ceramics, Vol.12, edited by N., Claussen, M., Rühle, and A.H., Heuer, American Ceramic Society, Columbus, 1984.Google Scholar