Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:04:50.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost and Performance of Low Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Lawrence E. Crooks ,
Ching Yao ,
Mitsuaki Arakawa ,
James D. Hale ,
Joseph W. Carlson ,
Paul Licato ,
John Hoenninger ,
Jeffrey Watts  and
Leon Kaufman
Lawrence E. Crooks
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco - Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA
Ching Yao
Affiliation:
Diasonics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
Mitsuaki Arakawa
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco - Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA
James D. Hale
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco - Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA
Joseph W. Carlson
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco - Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA
Paul Licato
Affiliation:
Diasonics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
John Hoenninger
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco - Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA
Jeffrey Watts
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco - Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA
Leon Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco - Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, South San Francisco, CA
Get access

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging technology has advanced on many fronts. Two important areas are the improvement of signal-to-noise levels and the understanding of imaging pulse sequence optimization. Based on these advances, low cost imagers using very low field permanent magnets are providing images of diagnostic quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 96: Symposium F – High Performance Permanent Magnet Materials , 1987 , 329
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kaufman, L, Crooks, L E, Margulis, A R and Proseus, J O. Siting, In Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Edited by Margulis, A, Higgins, C, Kaufman, L and Crooks, L. (University of California Press, San Francisco, CA 1983) Chapter 20.Google Scholar
2. Edelstein, W A, Bottemley, P A and Pfeifer, L M. A signal-to-noise calibration procedure for NMR imaging systems. Medical Physics 11, 180 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Hoult, D I, Chen, C-N, and Sank, V J. The Field Dependence of NMR Imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 3, 730 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Kaufman, L and Crooks, L E. Technical Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In Contemporary Imaging, Goldberg, H, Higgins, C B and Ring, E J, eds. (University of California Press, San Francisco, CA, 1985) p. 7.Google Scholar
5. Kaufman, L. Optimal Field Strength in Proton MRI. Toshiba Medical Review, International Edition, No 16, March 1986, pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
6. Crooks, L E, Arakawa, M, Hoenninger, J C, McCarten, B, Watts, J and Kaufman, L. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Effects of Magnetic Field Strength. Radiology 151, 127 (1984).Google Scholar
7. Posin, J P, Arakawa, M, Crooks, L E, Feinberg, D A, Hoenninger, J C, Watts, J C, Mills, C M and Kaufman, L. Hydrogen Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Head at 0.35 and 0.7 Tesla: Effects of Magnetic Field Strength. Radiology 157, 679 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Arakawa, M, Crooks, L E, McCarten, B, Hoenninger, J C, Watts, J C and Kaufman, L. A Comparison of Saddle-Shaped and Solenoidal Coils for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Radiology 154, 227 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Ortendahl, D A, Hylton, N M, Kaufman, L, Watts, J C, Crooks, L E, Mills, C M and Stark, D. Analytical Tools for MRI. Radiology 153, 479 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Mills, T C, Ortendahl, D A, Hylton, N M, Crooks, L E, Carlson, J W, and Kaufman, L. Partial Flip Angle MRI. Radiology 162, 531 (1987)Google Scholar