Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:53:21.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Microstructures in the YBA2CU3O7‐σ system: 1. Reaction with CO2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Angus I. Kingon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695‐7907
Cheryl D. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695‐7907
Thomas M. Hare
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695‐7907
Hayne Palmour III
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695‐7907
Carl C. Koch
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695‐7907
D.G. Haase
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695‐8202
Get access

Abstract

Controlled reactions have been undertaken between CO2 and polycrystalline YBa2Cu3O7‐σ in the temperature range 500°‐700°C. Typical reaction products are Y2BaCu05, BaC03 and CuO. Subsequent processing in O2 (e.g. sintering) results in the formation of liquid phases(s) by peritectic reaction at temperatures of 935‐975°C, well below the incongruent melting point of YBa2Cu3O7‐σ (∼1010°C). This “low temperature” liquid phase is shown to have a dramatic influence on the sintering process, and the resulting microstructures. The reactions are difficult to reverse even after extended times at temperatures >900°C. The results give an indication of the effect of adsorbed CO2 into YBa2Cu3O7‐σ powders, albeit on a more localized scale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kingon, A.I., Davis, C.D., Hare, T.M., Lawrence, M., Palmour III, H., Koch, C.C. and Haase, D.G., submitted to J. Mat. Res.Google Scholar
2 Kingon, A.I., Lawrence, M., Hare, T.M., Davis, C.D., Koch, C.C. and Haase, D.G., ibid, submitted.Google Scholar
3 Bhargava, A., Heuberger, M., and Snyder, R.L., Mat. Let. 5 (11, 12) 495‐8 (1987).Google Scholar
4 Gallagher, P.K., Grader, G.S., O'Bryan, H.M., Mat. Res. Bull. 23, 1491 (1988).Google Scholar
5 Shaw, T.M., IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, Private communication.Google Scholar
6 Aselage, T. and Keefer, A., J. Mat. Res. 3 (6), 1279‐91 (1988).Google Scholar