Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:36:12.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparison of Cw Laser and Electron-Beam Recrystallization of Polysilicon in Multilayer Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C.I. Drowley
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, 3500 Deer Creek Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304 *
C. Hu
Affiliation:
Electronics Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 +
Get access

Abstract

A thermal model for beam-induced melting of polysilicon in polysilicon/insulator/silicon structures has been used to compare CW Ar+ laser and electron-beam melting processes. The laser melting process exhibits a decreasing recrystallization threshold power and an increasing substrate melting threshold power with increasing insulator thickness. The decrease in recrystallization threshold with increasing insulator thickness is generally smaller for electron beams because of their deep penetration. The substrate melting threshold is approximately independent of insulator thickness for e-beams since no change in the power absorption occurs on melting of the polysilicon. As a result, the process window between the onset of recrystallization and melting of the substrate is narrower for e-beams than for laser beams. Also, essentially no window will exist between the onset of melting over a seed and substrate melting under an oxide if lateral epitaxy is performed with an electron beam.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Gat, A., Gerzberg, L., Gibbons, J.F., Magee, T.J., Peng, J., and Hong, J.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 775 (1978).Google Scholar
2.Kamins, T.I. and von Herzen, B.P., Electron Dev. Lett. EDL–2, 313 (1981).Google Scholar
3.Lee, K.F., Gibbons, J.F., Saraswat, K.C., and Kamins, T.I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 173 (1979).Google Scholar
4.Drowley, C.I., Hu, C., and Kamins, T.I., Extended Abstracts of the Electrochemical Society Spring Meeting, Montreal, Canada, 1982 (Electrochemical Society, N.J.), p. 234.Google Scholar
5.Drowley, C.I. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1982) (unpublished).Google Scholar
6.Lax, M.. Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 786 (1978).Google Scholar
7.Everhart, T.E. and Hoff, P.H., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 5837 (1971).Google Scholar
8.Neukermans, A. and Saperstein, W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 16, 1847 (1979).Google Scholar