Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T15:50:03.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Conventional and Self-Aligned a-Si:H Thin Film Transistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Chien-Sheng Yang
Affiliation:
Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Walter W. Read
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Chris B. Arthur
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Gregory N. Parsons
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

Conventional and self-aligned processes were developed for 250 °C inverse-staggered bottom gate a-Si:H thin film transistors (TFT's). Tri-layers of silicon nitride, amorphous silicon, and silicon nitride were continuously deposited in a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition system (PECVD). A self-alignment technique including back-side exposure and top nitride over etch was developed, which eliminates a masking step and the critical alignment of via opening used in typical TFT processing. Full self-aligned TFT's formed by selective n+ deposition were also fabricated successfully. Transistors show linear mobility ranging from 0.7 to 1.0 cm2/Vs, and current ON/OFF ratios greater than 106 were achieved for all TFT's.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. O'Mara, William C.,, International Thomson Publishing, p. 31, (1993).Google Scholar
2. Takabatake, Masaru, Ohwada, Jun-ichi, Ono, Yoshimasa A., Ono, Kikuo, Mimura, Akio, and Konishi, Nobutake, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 38, 1303, (1991).Google Scholar
3. Olasupo, K. R. and Hatalis, M. K., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 43, 1218, (1996).Google Scholar
4. Tanaka, Keiji, Nakazawa, Kenji, Suyama, Shiro, and Kato, Kinya, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 39, 916, (1992).Google Scholar
5. Hayashi, H., Kunii, M., Suzuki, N., Kanaya, Y., Kuki, M., Minegishi, M., IEDM Tech. Dig., 829, (1995).Google Scholar
6. Morimoto, Y., Hirano, K., Abe, H., Kuwahara, T., Hasegawa, I., Yuda, S., Sotani, N. and Yoneda, K., IEDM Tech. Dig., 837, (1995).Google Scholar
7. Aoyama, Takashi, Ogawa, Kazuhiro, Mochizuki, Yasuhiro, and Konishi, Nobutake, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 43, 701, (1996).Google Scholar
8. Parsons, G. N., Appl. phys. Lett., 59, 2456, (1991).Google Scholar
9. Parsons, G. N., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices Lett., 13, 80, (1992).Google Scholar
10. Reed, Walter W., Chien-Sheng Yang, to be published.Google Scholar
11. Busta, Heinz H., Pogemiller, Jay E., Standley, Robert W., and Mackenzie, Kenneth D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 36, 2883, (1989).Google Scholar