Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T13:55:10.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Ceramic Waste forms Produced by hot Uniaxial Pressing and by Cold Pressing and Sintering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

V. M. Oversby
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
E.R. Vance
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Synroc C waste form specimens prepared using the Australian-developed technology are uniaxially pressed in stainless steel bellows at 1200°C and 20MPa. This produces a material with high chemical and physical durability and with the radioactivity enclosed inside both the waste form and the bellows. An alternative method of producing the ceramic product is to use cold pressing of pellets followed by reactive sintering to provide densification and mineralization. Depending on the scale of waste form preparation required and on the activity level and nature of the waste streams, the cold press and sinter method may have advantages. To evaluate the effects of production method on waste form characteristics, especially resistance to dissolution or leaching of waste elements, we have prepared two simulated waste samples for evaluation. Both samples were prepared from liquid precursor materials (alkoxides, nitrates, and colloidal silica) and then doped with waste elements. The precursor material in each case corresponded to a basic phase assemblage of 60% zirconolite, 15% nepheline, 10% spinel, 10% perovskite, and 5% rutile. One sample was doped with 25% by weight of U; the other with 10% by weight each of U and Gd. Each sample was calcined at 750°C for 1 hr. in a 3.5% H2 in N2 atmosphere. Then one portion of each sample was hot pressed at temperatures ranging from 1120 to 1250°C and 20MPa pressure in steel bellows. A separate portion of each sample was formed into pellets, cold pressed, and sintered in various atmospheres at 1200°C to produce final products about 2/3 cm in diameter. Samples were then examined to determine density of the product, grain sizes of the phases, phase assemblage, and the location of the U and Gd in the final phases. Density data indicate that sintering gives good results provided that the samples are held at 200°C for long enough to allow trapped gases to escape.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Solomah, A. G., Hare, T. M., and Palmour, H., Nucl. Technol. 49, 183 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Oversby, V. M., VanKonynenburg, R. A., Glassley, W. E., and Curtis, P. G., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII, edited by Barkatt, A. and VanKonynenburg, R. A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 333 Vol., Pittsburgh, PA 1994) pp. 285292.Google Scholar
3. Ringwood, A. E., Kesson, S. E., Reeve, K. D., Levins, D. M., and Ramm, E. J., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1988) p. 223.Google Scholar
4. Vance, E. R. and Agrawal, D. K., Nucl. Chem. Waste Management 3, 229 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Vance, E. R., Begg, B. D., Day, R. A., and Bell, C. J., Zirconolite-Rich Ceramics for Actinide Wastes, this volume.Google Scholar