Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:37:48.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison Between Atomistic and Continuum-Mechanics Modelling of Grain-Boundary Fracture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

F. Cleri
Affiliation:
Divisione Materiali Avanzati, ENEA, Centro Ricerche Casaccia, C.P. 2400, 00100 Roma (Italy)
S. R. Phillpot
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 (USA)
D. Wolf
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 (USA)
Get access

Abstract

We use the Peierls-Nabarro continuum mechanics model of dislocation nucleation, modified according to the results of atomistic simulations, to interpret the experimental results of fracture response in symmetric-tilt grain boundaries in Cu. We then directly perform Molecular Dynamics simulations of fracture propagation and dislocation emission from a microcrack placed in the interface plane of the symmetric-tilt (221)(221) grain boundary in fee Cu. Direction-dependent fracture response is observed in agreement with experiments, namely the microcrack advancing by brittle fracture along the [114] direction and being blunted by dislocation emission along the opposite [114] direction. Moreover, we are able to quantify important differences with respect to the continuum model due to the shielding of the stress field at the crack-tip and to the presence of the excess stress at the interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hondros, E.D. and Mc Lean, D., in Grain Boundary Structure and Properties, edited by Chadwick, G.A. and Smith, D.A., p. 353, Academic Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
2. Hondros, E.D. and Seah, M.P., in Physical Metallurgy, p. 855, edited by Cahn, R.W. and Haasen, P., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.Google Scholar
3. Cottrell, A.H., Mat. Sci. Tech., 5, 1165 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Exner, H.E., in Physical Metallurgy, p. 630, edited by Cahn, R.W. and Haasen, P., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.Google Scholar
5. Watanabe, T., Mat. Sci. Forum, 126–128, 295 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Wang, J.-S. and Anderson, P.M., Acta Metall. Mater., 39, 779 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Griffith, A.A., Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. (London), A 221, 163 (1920).Google Scholar
8. Wolf, D. and Jaszczak, D.J., in Materials Interfaces, p. 662, edited by Wolf, D. and Yip, S., Chapman & Hall, London, 1992.Google Scholar
9. Rice, J.R. and Thomson, R., Phil. Mag., 29, 73 (1974).Google Scholar
10. Schoeck, G., Phil. Mag. A 63, 111 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Rice, J.R., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 40, 239 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Xu, G., Argon, A.S. and Ortiz, M., Phil. Mag. A 72, 415 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Xu, G., Argon, A.S. and Ortiz, M., Phil. Mag. A 75, 341 (1997).Google Scholar
14. Wang, J.-S. and Beltz, G.E., in Fracture Mechanics: 25th Volume. ASTM STP 1220, p. 95, edited by Erdogan, F., American Society for Testing of Materials, Philadelphia, 1995.Google Scholar
15. Cleri, F., Phillpot, S.R., Wolf, D. and Yip, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, in press (1997).Google Scholar
16. Cleri, F., Yip, S., Wolf, D. and Phillpot, S.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2278 (1997).Google Scholar
17. Cuitino, A.M. and Ortiz, M., Acta Mater., 44, 427 (1996).Google Scholar
18. Sun, Y. and Beltz, G.E., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 1905 (1995).Google Scholar
19. Sun, Y., Beltz, G.E. and Rice, J.R., Mat. Sci. Eng., A170, 67 (1993).Google Scholar
20. Wolf, D., in Materials Interfaces, p. 12, edited by Wolf, D. and Yip, S., Chapman & Hall, London, 1992.Google Scholar
21. Rice, J.R., Suo, Z. and Wang, J.-S., in Metal Ceramic Interfaces. Acta-Scripta Met. Proc. Ser., Vol. 4, p. 269, edited by Ruhle, M., Evans, A.G., Ashby, M.F. and Hirth, J.P., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
22. Lutsko, J.F., Wolf, D., Yip, S., Phillpot, S.R. and Nguyen, T., Phys. Rev. B 38, 11572 (1988).Google Scholar