Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T20:19:21.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Analysis of Results From Deterministic Calculations of the Release of Radioactivity From Geological Disposal of Spent Fuel in Crystalline Rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Slavka Prvakova
Affiliation:
EC-JRC, Institute for Energy, P.O. Box 2, 1755 ZGPetten, Netherlands
Pavel V. Amosov
Affiliation:
Mining Institute, MI KSC, Fersman Street, 24, Apatity, Murmansk Region, 184200, Russia
Karl-Fredrik Nilsson
Affiliation:
EC-JRC, Institute for Energy, P.O. Box 2, 1755 ZGPetten, Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents results from deterministic calculations of radionuclide migration in a deep geological environment. The concept assumes single canister with spent nuclear fuel situated in bentonite (near-field) and surrounded by crystalline host rock (far-field). The results are presented in the form of release rates from the near-field and far-field, which contains also a part of advective release from the system of two single fractures. Additionally, radiological risk is evaluated in the form of dose rates for a water drinking scenario for an exposed population group. The analyses have been done by using the methodologies and computer codes used at the Institute for Energy EC-JRC in the Netherlands and the Mining Institute KSC RAS in Russia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Interim data report for the safety assessment SR-Can. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. R-04-34 (2004), 76 p.Google Scholar
2 ACRi. PORFLOW: A Software Tool for Multiphase Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transport in Fractured Porous Media. User's manual. Version 3.07. Analytic and Computational Research, Inc. (1996), 326 p.Google Scholar
3 Tang, D.H., Frind, O.E., Sudicky, E.A., Water Resources Res. 3, 555564 (1981).Google Scholar
4 PROPER Monitor user's manual, Version 3.2. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (2000), 68 p.Google Scholar
5 Cilffe, K.A., Kelly, M., COMP23 version 1.2.2 user's manual. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. R-04-64 (2004), 76 p.Google Scholar
6 Elert, M., Gylling, B., Lindgren, M., Assessment model validity document FARF31. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. R-04-51 (2004), 39 p.Google Scholar
7 International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. IAEA Safety Fundamentals, Safety Series No. 115. Vienna, Austria (1996), 328 p.Google Scholar
8 Normy radiacionnoj bezopasnosti (NRB-99).-M.:Minzdrav, Russian Federation (1999), 115p.Google Scholar