Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T18:20:20.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CHF3 and NH3 Additives for Reactive ion Etching of GaAs Using CCl2F2 and SICI4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Kuen-Sane Din  and
Gou-Chung Chi
Kuen-Sane Din
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutong, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Gou-Chung Chi
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutong, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Get access

Abstract

Two fundamental requirements for RIE are the formation of nearly volatile etch products and sufficiently high physical bombardment to remove all substances on the surface. In this study, the GaAs wafer was in-situ pretreated with NH3 or CHF3 plasma prior to actual etching process. The main etchants are CCl2F2 and SiCl4. By adding these additives to the main etch gases, the resulting etch performance was significantly affected. For instance, DC self-bias of CCl2F2 plasma is relatively low and can increase with such gas addition, thus the etching properties related to physical bombardment change too. CHF3 improve GaAs etch rate in CCl2F2through increasing concentration of reactive chlorine-containing species. While CHF3 enhance etch rate in SiCl4 plasma. The as etched samples were examined with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Details of the experimental results will be described.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 240: Symposium E – Advanced III-V Compound Semiconductor Growth, Processing and Devices , 1991 , 373
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cheung, R., Thomas, S., Mclntyre, I., Wilkinson, C. D. W. and Beaumont, S. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B6, 1911 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Ryan, F. J., Chang, M. F., Vahren Kamp, R. P., Williams, D. A., Fleming, W. P. and Kirkpatrick, C. G., GaAs Integrated Circuit Symp., Tech. Dig., IEEE, 45 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Hu, E. L. and Coldren, L. A., SPIE J., 797, 98 (1987)Google Scholar
4. Coldren, L. A., Iga, K., Miller, B.I. and Rentschler, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 681 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Vawter, G. A., Coldren, L. A., Mertz, J. M. and Hu, E. L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 719 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Saito, H., Noguchi, Y. and Nagai, H., Electron. Lett., 22, 1157 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Pang, S. W., Solid State Technol., 27, 249 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Kondo, N., Kawashima, M. and Sugiura, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 24, L370 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Klinger, R. E. and Greene, J. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 24, 620 (1981)Google Scholar
10. Salimian, S. and Cooper, C. B. III, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B6 (6), 1641 (1988).Google Scholar
11. Seaward, K. L., Moll, N.J. and Coulman, D. J., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 2358 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Din, K. S. and Hwang, R. Y., Materials Science and Engineering. B9, 57 (1991).Google Scholar