Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T16:15:54.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Charging Microscopy of Semi-Insulating Gallium Arsenide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

T.C. Sheu
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Electronics Research, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287
S. Myhajlenko
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Electronics Research, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287
J.L. Edwards
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Electronics Research, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287
R.J. Roedel
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Electronics Research, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287
S.J. Krause
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Electronics Research, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ 85287
Get access

Abstract

The recent demonstration of “charging microscopy” to reveal resistivity variations in semi-insulating GaAs has generated interest in using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) as a contactless characterization technique for GaAs wafers. Resistivity variations give rise to a surface potential and secondary electron (SE) contrast, or “charging microscopy”, when viewing a wafer in the SEM. In this work we have shown that operating conditions may play a significant role in the SE image. Varying accelerating voltage from 5 to 35 keV gave rise to minor changes in the SE image, but varying beam current from 2×10−11A to 2×10−6A resulted in dramatic changes in the SE image, with two image contrast reversals occurring. The explanation for these changes in the SE image are unclear, but factors that are involved include surface and bulk conductivity, beam induced dielctric relaxation, and the sample-detector geometry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nanishi, Y., Ishida, S., Honda, T., Yamazaki, H., & Miyazawa, S., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 21 L335 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Wakefield, B., Leigh, P.A., and Elliot, C.R., Appl. Phys. Letters, 45, 66 1984.Google Scholar
3. Hovel, H.J. and Guidotti, D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED–32, 2231 1985.Google Scholar
4. Clark, S. and Stirland, D.J., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., 60, 339 1981.Google Scholar
5. Kamejima, T., Shimura, F., Matsumoto, Y., Watanabe, H., and Mitsui, M., Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 21, L721 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Wakefield, B. and Davey, S.T., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., 76, 373 1985.Google Scholar