Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T01:25:58.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of the Viscoelastic Behavior of Polyaniline Solutions for Fiber Spinning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. P. Chacko ,
S. S. Hardaker ,
B. Huang  and
R. V. Gregory
A. P. Chacko
Affiliation:
School of Textiles, Fibers and Polymer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1307
S. S. Hardaker
Affiliation:
School of Textiles, Fibers and Polymer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1307
B. Huang
Affiliation:
School of Textiles, Fibers and Polymer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1307
R. V. Gregory
Affiliation:
School of Textiles, Fibers and Polymer Science, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1307
Get access

Abstract

Solutions of emeraldine base(EB) in DMPU have been successfully spun into fibers and characterized according to their morphology, mechanical and electrical properties. This study presents results for as-spun (undrawn) fibers. The viscoelastic behavior of EB spin solutions have been investigated with dynamic measurements of the complex moduli, first normal stress coefficient, and complex viscosity. A knowledge of the viscoelastic behavior of emeraldine base solutions is crucial for effective processing into fibers and films.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 413: Symposium W – Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Organic Solid State Materials III , 1995 , 503
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Andreatta, A., Heeger, A. J., and Smith, P., Polymer Communications, 31, 275 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Tzou, K. T. and Gregory, R. V., Synthetic Metals, 55–57, 983 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Tzou, K. T. and Gregory, R. V., Polymer Preprints, 35(1), 245 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Hsu, C. H., Cohen, J. D., and Tietz, R. F., Synthetic Metals, 59, 37 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Wang, Y. Z., Joo, J., Hsu, C. H., Epstein, A. J., Synthetic Metals, 68, 207 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Tzou, K. T. and Gregory, R. V., Synthetic Metals, 69, 109 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Jain, R. and Gregory, R. V., Synthetic Metals, 74, 263, (1995).Google Scholar
8. Chiang, J. C., MacDiarmid, A. G., Synthetic Metals, 13, 193 (1986)Google Scholar
9. Paul, D. R., J. Appl. Poly. Sci., 12, 2273, (1968)Google Scholar
10. Ziabicki, A., Fundamentals of Fiber Formation: The Science of Fiber Spinning and Drawing, Wiley, New York, 1976. p 619.Google Scholar
11. Ferry, J. D., Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1970, p 44 Google Scholar
12. Winter, H. H. and Chambon, F., J. Rheology, 30(2), 367, (1986)Google Scholar
13. Schneider, T., Wolf, B. A., Rheol. Acta 34, 172, (1995)Google Scholar
14. Bird, R. B., Armstrong, R. C., Hassager, O., Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987, p 150 Google Scholar
15. Laun, H. M., J. Rheology, 30(3), 459, (1986)Google Scholar