Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T07:26:01.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the Seed SiO2 Layer in Stacked SiO2-Ta2O5 Gate Dielectrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Pradip K. Roy
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Orlando, Fl
Michael A. Laughery
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Orlando, Fl
Carlos M. Chacon
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Orlando, Fl
Ayman M. Kanan
Affiliation:
Therma-Wave, Inc.Fremont, Ca
Thomas Daugherty
Affiliation:
Therma-Wave, Inc.Fremont, Ca
Get access

Abstract

A major hurdle in the gate dielectric scaling using conventionally grown SiO2 has been excessive tunneling that occurs in ultra-thin (<25Å) SiO2. High dielectric constant materials have high concentrations of bulk fixed charge, unacceptable levels of Si-Ta2O5 interface trap states, and low Silicon interface carrier mobilities. Stacked Ta2O5 gate dielectrics have alleviated these issues with significant improvements in leakage, tunneling, charge trapping behavior, and interface substructure. Transistors fabricated using this stacked gate dielectric exhibit excellent sub threshold, saturation, and drive currents. In this study, we have characterized the first SiO2 (8-12Å) layer of the SiO2-Ta2O5 stack by ThermaWave (TWI 5240SE) absolute ellipsometry (AE) using He-Ne (λ= 630nm) laser light source and by corona oxide semiconductor (COS) non-contact techniques. We have also monitored the kinetics of a thin hydrocarbon layer deposition on top of these films that can be removed by simple heat treatments (250°C - 400°C). Electrical thickness (Tox) of these oxides measured by COS indicates this hydrocarbon layer has no impact on Tox. Stacked Ta2O5 was synthesized by metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) of a 50-75Å thick Ta2O5 layer at 480°C, 300mTorr followed by an in-situ 550°C UV-03 anneal to densify the Ta2O5 film and grow an additional 5Å SiO2 layer underneath the first grown SiO2 layer resulting in an effective SiO2 thickness of 25-30Å (process 1). We have done exactly the same deposition schedule after chemically removing the first LP grown SiO2 layer resulting in an effective SiO2 thickness of 15-20Å (process 2). Transistors are now fabricated for our sub-0.16μm CMOS technologies. These stacked films indicated excellent charge trapping (Dit, Vfb, Qtot), leakage and tunneling characteristics from COS electrical measurements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Chaneliere, C., Autran, J. L., Devine, R.A.B. and Ballard, B., Mat. Sci and Eng, R–22, 269 (1998)10.1016/S0927-796X(97)00023-5Google Scholar
[2] Shimada, H. and Ohmi, T., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 43, 431 (1996).10.1109/16.485657Google Scholar
[3] Campbell, S., Gilmer, D., Wang, X., Hsieh, M., Kim, H., Gladfelter, W., and Yan, J., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 44, 104 (1997).10.1109/16.554800Google Scholar
[4] Nishioka, Y., Kimura, S., Shinriki, H., and Mukai, K., J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 410 (1987).10.1149/1.2100469Google Scholar
[5] Roy, P.K., Chacon, C., Ma, Y., Kizilyalli, I.C., and Horner, G. in Diagnostic Techniques for Semiconductor Materials and Devices, edited by Raichoudhary, P., Benton, J., Schroeder, D., and Shaffner, T., (Electrochem Soc.) SPIE 3322, 280 (1997).Google Scholar
[6] Azzam, R. M. A. and Bashara, N. M., “Ellipsometry and Polarized Light,” North-Holland, Amsterdam (1977), Chap. 4.Google Scholar
[7] Tompkins, H. G., “A User's Guide to Ellipsometry,” Acad. Press, San Diego (1993), Chap. 1.Google Scholar
[8] Roy, P. K. and Kizilyalli, I. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 (22), 2835 (1998).10.1063/1.121473Google Scholar
[9] Kizilyalli, I. C., Huang, R.Y.S. and Roy, P.K., IEEE EDL, 19 (11), 423 (1998).10.1109/55.728900Google Scholar
[10] Horner, G., Kleefstra, M., Miller, T., and Peters, M., Solid State Technol. 38, 79 (1995).Google Scholar
[11] Berglund, C.N., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED–31, 701 (1966).10.1109/T-ED.1966.15827Google Scholar