Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T23:15:40.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of High-Level Nuclear Waste Glass Using Magnetic Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Frank E. Senftle
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059
Arthur N. Thorpe
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059
Julius R. Grant
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059
Aaron Barkatt
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064
Get access

Abstract

Magnetic measurements constitute a promising method for the characterization of nuclear waste glasses in view of their simplicity and small sample weight requirements.

Initial studies of simulated high-level waste glasses show that the Curie constant is generally a useful indicator of the Fe2+:Fe3+ ratio. Glasses produced by air-cooling in large vessels show systematic deviations between experimental and calculated values, which are indicative of the presence of small amounts of crystalline iron-containing phases. Most of the iron in these phases becomes dissolved in the glass upon re-heating and more rapid quenching. The studies further show that upon leaching the glass in water some of the iron in the surface regions of the glass is converted to a form which has high temperature-independent magnetic susceptibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Senffle, F.E. and Thorpe, A., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 17, 234247 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Thorpe, A.N., Senftle, F.E., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 197, 836840 (1964).Google Scholar
3 Thorpe, A.N. and Senftle, F.E., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 28, 981994 (1964).Google Scholar
4 Senftle, F.E., Thorpe, A.N. and Sullivan, S., J. Geophys. Res. 27, 68256833 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Thorpe, A.N., Senftle, F.E., Sullivan, S., and Alexander, C.C., Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 24532462 (1970).Google Scholar
6 Sullivan, S., Thorpe, A.N., Alexander, C.C., Senftle, F., and Dwornik, E., Proc. 2nd Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 24332449 (1971).Google Scholar
7 Thorpe, A.N., Senftle, F.E., Briggs, C., and Alexander, C.C., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 21, 8590 (1973).Google Scholar
8 Thorpe, A.N., Sullivan, S., Alexander, C.C., Senftle, F.E. and Dwornik, E.J., Proc. 3rd Lunar Sci. Conf., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, Special issue, 3, 24652478 (1972).Google Scholar
9 Bamford, C.R., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 1, 159169 (1960).Google Scholar
10 Bamford, C.R., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 2, 163168 (1961).Google Scholar
11 Glass, B.P., Senftle, F.E., Muerow, D.W., Aggrey, K.E., and Thorpe, A.N., Proc. 2nd. Intern. Conf. Nat. Glass, Prague, 361-369 (1987).Google Scholar
12 Jantzen, C.M. and Bickford, D.F., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44, 135146 (1985).Google Scholar
13 Mendel, J.E., ed., Final Report of the Leach Mechanism Program, Pacific Northwest Lab. Rept. PNL-5157 (Richland, WA, 1984) p. 29.Google Scholar