Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:15:12.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Copper-Ceramic Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

W. M. Kriven  and
S. H. Risbud
W. M. Kriven
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Ceramic Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, 105 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
S. H. Risbud
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Ceramic Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, 105 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801
Get access

Abstract

The interfacial zones in copper-magnesium aluminosilicate materials were characterized by several microscopic and microchemical techniques. Interfaces between copper-glass, copper-partially crystallized glass, and copper-fully crystallized glass were studied with the specific goal of determining the oxidation state of copper in various locations in the microstructure of the reaction zones. Optical microscopy, cathodoluminescence, electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), SEM, TEM, and other microtechniques were used. The presence of copper in various oxidation states can be attributed to the thermodynamics and kinetics of the system. Results correlating the observed interfacial microstructure and the thermochemistry of the system are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 40: Symposium J – Electronic Packaging Materials Science I , 1984 , 323
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pask, J. A. and Fulrath, R. M., J. Amer. Ceramic Society 45, 592 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Poetzinger, J. E. and Risbud, S. H., de Physique, J., in press (1985).Google Scholar
3. Ball, M. D., Amor, M. P. and Lamb, H. J., Int. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 61: Ch. 2, EHAG, 59–62 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Kaufman, M. J., Eades, J. A., Loretto, M. H. and Fraser, H. L., Met. Trans., 1561–1571 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ram, A. et. al., Glass Tech., 9, 1 (1968).Google Scholar
6. Banerjee, S. and Paul, A., J. Amer. Ceramic. Soc. 59, 286 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Parke, S. and Webb, R. S., Phys. and Chem. of Glasses, 13, 157 (1972).Google Scholar
8. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 56th Edition, pp D–45 to D-50, CRC Press, Cleveland, OH 1975–1976.Google Scholar