Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T03:27:40.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in Surface Mechanical Properties Through Electrochemical Modifications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Martha M. McCann
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Sean G. Corcoran
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical response of materials can be dramatically altered by the presence of absorbed species on the surface. An electrochemical environment enables discrete control of the surface, keeping it clean (comparable to ultra-high vacuum) and inducing stable stress states. Applying a potential to the surface alters surface charge, which changes the surface free energy. Oxides are easily added or removed. Utilizing the phenomenon of underpotential deposition (UPD), one monolayer of metal can be added to a surface. The degree of lattice mismatch between the metal and the deposited monolayer will also vary the stress state of the surface. The changes in the mechanical properties of these highly controlled surfaces are measured by in-situ nanoindentation at various potentials. Nanoindentation of single crystals with very low dislocation densities allows careful observation of dislocation behavior with applied load. This enables the identification of dislocation mechanisms by quantifying the changes in mechanical properties under specific environments. Au has been extensively studied in electrochemistry literature; it is well behaved and well characterized. It is a model system that has demonstrated variation in mechanical properties in different electrochemical states. Lessons learned on Gold have also been applied to Zn and Ni systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.) Gane, N., and Bowden, F.P., J. Appl. Phys., 39 1432 (1968)Google Scholar
2.) Bahr, D.F., Kramer, D.E., and Gerberich, W.W., Acta mater., 46(10) 3605, (1998).Google Scholar
3.) Corcoran, S.G., Colton, R.J., Lilleodden, E.T., and Gerberich, W.W., Phys. Rev. B, Rap. Commun., 55(24), R16057, (1997).Google Scholar
4.) Pharr, G.M., and Oliver, W.C., J. Mater. Res., 4(1) 94, (1989).Google Scholar
5.) Fivel, M.C., Robertson, C.F., Acta mater., 46(17) 6183, (1998).Google Scholar
6.) Robertson, C.F., Fivel, M.C., J. Mater. Res., 14 (6), 2251, (1999).Google Scholar
7.) Bahr, D.F., Watkins, C.M., Kramer, D.E., and Gerberich, W.W., MRS Pro., 52, 83, (1998).Google Scholar
8.) Latanision, R.M., and Staehle, R.W., Acta Met. 17, 307, (1969).Google Scholar
9.) Oliver, W.C., Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res., 7(6) 1564, (1992).Google Scholar
10.) Woirgard, J., Tromas, C., Audurier, V., Girard, J.C., MRS Proceedings, 52, 65, (1998).Google Scholar
11.)Gouldstone, A., Koh, H.J., and Suresh, S., Acta mater., 48(9) 2277, (2000).Google Scholar
12.) Gerberich, W.W., Nelson, J.C., Acta mater., 44(9) 3585, (1999).Google Scholar
13.) Kolb, D.M., Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering, ed. Gerischer, H. and Tobias, Ch. W. (Wiley, New York, 1978), 11, p. 125;Google Scholar
14.) Angerstein-Kozlowska, H., Conway, B. E., J. Electroanal. Chem., 228, 429 (1987).Google Scholar
15.) Mann, A.B., and Pethica, J.B., Materials Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 436, 153 (1997).Google Scholar
16.) Monocrystals, Inc. Cleveland, OHGoogle Scholar
17.) Clavilier, J., Faure, R., Guinet, G., and Durand, R., J. Electroanal. Chem., 107, 205 (1980).Google Scholar
18.) Baker, S.P., MRS Tutorial, Measuring Mechanical Properties in the Nanometer Regime, (2000)Google Scholar