Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T18:26:22.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biosurfactant Production Using Mixed Cultures Under Non-Aseptic Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C. Vipulanandan ,
G. L. Ghurye  and
R. C. Willson
C. Vipulanandan
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
G. L. Ghurye
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
R. C. Willson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-4792, USA
Get access

Abstract

Surfactants increase the accessibility of adsorbed hydrocarbons and mobilize immiscible petroleum hydrocarbons for treatment. Biosurfactants have the advantage of biodegradability and non-toxicity over their synthetic counterparts, and can be produced from renewable sources. In this study the production of biosurfactant from molasses was investigated in continuously stirred batch reactors. The effects of substrate concentration, yeast extract and peptone on biomass accumulation and biosurfactant production were investigated. Biosurfactant production was quantified by surface tension reduction and critical micelle dilution (CMD). Biosurfactant production was directly correlated with biomass production, and was improved with the addition of yeast extract. Centrifugation of the whole broth reduced surface tension. The performance of the biosurfactant produced from molasses under non-aseptic condition is comparable to other published results.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 344: Symposium I – Materials and Processes for Environmental Protection , 1994 , 315
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ramsay, B., McCarthy, J., Guerra-Santos, L., Kappeli, O., Fiechter, A., and Margaritis, A., Can. J. Microbiol. 34 (1988) p. 1209.Google Scholar
2. Guerra-Santos, L., Kappeli, O., and Fiechter, A., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48 (1984) p. 301.Google Scholar
3. Gutierrez, J. R., and Erickson, L. E., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 20 (1978) p. 1833.Google Scholar
4. Horowitz, S., Gilbert, J. N., and Griffin, M. W., J. Indust. Microbiol. 6 (1990) p. 243.Google Scholar
5. Laha, S., and Luthy, R. G., Environ. Sci. Technol. 25 (1991) p. 1920.Google Scholar
6. Manresa, M. A., Bastida, J., Mercade, M. E. Robert, M. de Andres, , C Espuny, M. J., and Guinea, J., J. Indust. Microbiol. 8 (1991) p. 133.Google Scholar
7. Margaritis, A., Zajic, J.E., and Gerson, D.F., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 21 (1979) p. 1151.Google Scholar
8. Park, S. C., and Baratti, J., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38 (1991) p. 304.Google Scholar
9. Francy, D. S., Thomas, J. M., Raymond, R. L. and Ward, C. H., J. Indust. Microbiol. 8 (1991) p. 237.Google Scholar
10. Updegraff, D. M.,, Dev. Indust. Microbiol. 31 (1990) p. 135.Google Scholar
11. Drouin, C. M., and Cooper, D. G., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40 (1992) p. 86.Google Scholar
12. Falatko, D. M., and Novak, J. T., Water Environ.. Res. 64 (1991) p. 163.Google Scholar
13. MacElwee, C. G., Lee, H., and Trevors, J. T., J. Indust. Microbiol. 5 (1990) p. 25.Google Scholar
14. Jenneman, G. E., McInerney, M. J., Knapp, R. M., Clark, J. B., Ferro, J. M., Revus, D. E., and Menzine, D. E., Dev. Indust. Microbiol. 21 (1988) p. 485.Google Scholar
15. Marchesi, J. R., Russell, N. J., White, G. F.., and House, W. A., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57 (1991) p. 2507.Google Scholar
16. Cooper, D. G., and Goldenberg, B. G., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53 (1987) p. 224.Google Scholar
17. Cirigliano, M. C., and Carman, G. M., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48 (1984) p. 747.Google Scholar
18. Cooper, D. G., and Paddock, D. A., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47 (1984) p. 173.Google Scholar
19. Duvnjak, Z., Cooper, D. G., and Kosaric, N., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24 (1992) p. 165.Google Scholar
20. John, M., Henninger, W., and Schmidt, J., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 20 (1978) p. 619.Google Scholar
21. Zajic, J. E., Guignard, H., and Gerson, D. F., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19 (1977) p. 1303.Google Scholar