Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:39:26.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biologically Induced Clay Formation in Subsurface Granitic Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Victoria A. Tuck
Affiliation:
Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
J. M. West
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
K. Bateman
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
P. Coombs
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
A. E. Milodowski
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
R. Edyvean
Affiliation:
Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Get access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to identify the rock-water and microbial interactions influencing accelerated smectite-clay formation. Packed columns and stirred batch reactors contained Äspö granodiorite, artificial groundwater mimicking that from Äspö and combinations of three types of subsurface chemolithotrophic bacteria, two of which were indigenous to the Äspö rocks. Results showed evidence that, within 5 days under anaerobic reducing conditions, all three of the bacterial types produced copious biofilamentous ‘meshes’ across porespaces, apparently using the larger grains as anchor points. The biofilaments quickly became encrusted with fine grained material and surrounded with neoformed clay-like deposits. In contrast, the abiotic controls showed little or no evidence of clay formation suggesting that this process is biologically induced or controlled. A second series of abiotic experiments to determine the effects of increased acidity showed evidence of mineral pitting and dissolution along with an increase in concentration of soluble species thought to be important in smectite formation (i.e. Si, Al, Mg, Fe, Ca, Na). However, there was no evidence of clay formation, and the biotic experiments showed no signs of bulk scale pH change, suggesting that either the bacteria are actively concentrating relevant chemical species at a local level or they are acting as templates or nucleation points for clay formation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Amy, P. A. and Haldeman, D. L. (Eds) The Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Subsurface. CRC Lewis Publishers. (1997).Google Scholar
2. Banwart, S.., Gustafsson, E.., Laaksoharju, M.., Pedersen, K.., Tullborg, E.., Wallin, B.., Wilkberg, P.., Snellman, M.., Pitkänen, P. and Leino-Forsman, H.. The Äspö redox investigations in block scale. Project summary and implications for repository performance assessment., SKB Technical Report 95–26, (1995)Google Scholar
3. Christofi, N. and Philp, J. C., In The Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Subsurface, edited by Amy, P. S. and Haldeman, D. L., pages 266297, CRC Press LLC, (1997)Google Scholar
4. Fredrickson, J. K.., Garland, T. R.., Hicks, R. J., Thomas, J. M., Li, S. W., McFadden, K. M.. Geomicrobiology Journal. 7: 5366 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Pedersen, K. and Bachofen, R.. Microbial life in deep granitic rock. In Int. Symp. On Subsurface Microbiology (ISSM-96) pages 1521. Davos, Switzerland (1996)Google Scholar
6. Pedersen, K. and Karlsson, F.. Investigation of subterranean microorganisms: Their importance for performance assessment of radioactive waste disposal, SKB Technical Report, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. Stockholm, (1995).Google Scholar
7. Bennett, P. C., Rogers, J. R., Choi, W. J. & Hiebert, F. K.. Geomicobiology. 8:319 (2001)Google Scholar
8. Bennett, P. C., Hiebert, F. K., and Rogers, J. R., Hydrogeology Journal 8: 47 (2000)Google Scholar
9. Chapelle, F. H.. Hydrogeology Journal, 8:4146 (2000)Google Scholar
10. Ehrlich, H. L., Geomicrobiology, Marcel Dekker Inc., third edition, (1996)Google Scholar
11. Konhauser, K. O., Fisher, Q. J., Fyfe, W. S., Longstaffe, F. J., and Powell, M. A., Geomicrobiology 5, 209 (1998)Google Scholar
12. Tazaki, K., Clays and Clay Mineralogy 45, 203 (1997)Google Scholar
13. Rogers, J. R., Benett, P. C., and Choi, W. J., American Mineralogist 83, 1532 (1998)Google Scholar
14. Hama, K., Bateman, K., coombs, P., Hards, V. L., Milodowski, A. E., West, J. M., Wetton, P.D., Yoshida, H. and Aoki, K., Clay Minerals 36: 599 (2001)Google Scholar
15. Motamedi, M.. and Pedersen, K., International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 48, 311 (1998)Google Scholar
16. Hobbie, J. E., Daley, R. J. and Jasper, S.. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 33: 125 (1977)Google Scholar
17. Jass, J. and Lappin-Scott, H. M.. Practical course on biofilm formation using the modified Robbins Device, Biofilm Technologies Research Group, University of Exeter, UK, (1992)Google Scholar
18. Postgate, J. R., The sulphate-reducing bacteria, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, (1984)Google Scholar