Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:10:33.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bedrock Characterisation of Four Candidate Repository Sites in Finland As Determined by He-Gas Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. Hartikainen
Affiliation:
Oy Helium Gas Research HGR Ltd, Kekkolantie 25 A, FIN-40520Jyväskylä, FINLAND, harka@ horus.co.jyu.fi
K. Hartikainen
Affiliation:
Oy Helium Gas Research HGR Ltd, Kekkolantie 25 A, FIN-40520Jyväskylä, FINLAND, harka@ horus.co.jyu.fi
J. Timonen
Affiliation:
University of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 35, FIN-40351Jyvädskylä, FINLAND, jussi.timonen@phys.jyu.fi
A. Hautojärvi
Affiliation:
Posiva Oy, Mikonkatu 15 A, FIN-00100 Helsinki, FINLAND, aimo.hautojarvi@posiva.fi
Get access

Abstract

At the end of the year 2000, one of four sites will be chosen as the final repository site in Finland. Therefore accurate and comprehensive statistics of the bedrock characteristics such as porosity [% ] and effective diffusion coefficient [m2/s ] of these sites are of importance. Altogether 115 rock samples from the four sites were measured by different He-gas methods to achieve this goal.

The results obtained indicate that the average bedrock properties at these sites are quite similar. Variations among individual samples and different rock types within one repository site were larger than variations among the averaged values of the four sites. Some indication of increased microfracturing was also found in samples of small size.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Väätäinen, K., Timonen, J. and Hautojärvi, A., pp. 851856 in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, edited by Interrante, C.G. and Pabalan, R.T. (Materials Research Society, Vol.294, Pittsburgh, 1993).Google Scholar
2. Hartikainen, K., Vaitdinen, K., Hautojärvi, A. and Timonen, J., pp. 821826 in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII, edited by Barkatt, A. and Konynenburg, R.A. Van (Materials Research Society, Vol.333, Pittsburgh, 1994).Google Scholar
3. Hartikainen, K., Hautojärvi, A., Pietarila, H. and Timonen, J., pp. 435440 in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C. (Materials Research Society, Vol.353, Pittsburgh, 1995).Google Scholar
4. Hartikainen, K., Timonen, J., Väätänen, K., Pietarila, H. and A. Hautojärvi, Results for Matrix Diffusion by Helium Gas Methods (in Finnish), Report YJT-94-07 (Helsinki, 1994).Google Scholar
5. Hartikainen, J., Hartikainen, K., Pietarila, H. and Timonen, J., Permeability and Diffusivity Measurements with the He-gas Method of Disturbed Zone in Rock Samples Cored from the Full-Scale Experimental Deposition Holes in the TVO Research tunnel, Report YJT-95-16, Helsinki, December 1995.Google Scholar
6. Seager, S., Geertson, L. and Giddings, J., pp. 168169 in Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data (Vol. 8, No. 2, April 1963).Google Scholar
7. Houghton, G., Ritchie, P. and Thomson, J., pp. 221227 in Chemical Engineering Science (Vol. 17, April 1961).Google Scholar
8. Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C., Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959).Google Scholar
9. Neretnieks, I., Diffusion in the Rock Matrix: An Important Factor in Radionuclide Retardation?, (Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol.85, No. B8, August 10, 1980), pp. 43794397.Google Scholar