Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T21:53:28.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Au Ohmic Contacts to P-Type Hg1-xCdxte Utilizing Thin Interfacial Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

V. Krishnamurthy
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
A. Simmons
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas. Texas 75265
C. R. Helms
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Get access

Abstract

Ohmic behavior is observed in electroless Au contacts to p -type Hg1−xCdxTe. Our investigation of the interfacial chemistry of such contacts suggest that this ohmic behavior may be due to the presence of a Te,O, and CI layer. To verify this correlation with interfacial chemistry, thin plasma oxide layers were used in evaporated Au contacts. The annealed plasma oxidized contacts exhibited low contact resistances. This behavior was attributed to a low interface state density at the interfacial layer/Hg1−xCdxTe interface. In comparison, as-deposited and annealed Au contacts without a thin interfacial layer were rectifying with a large barrier height.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Reine, M.B., Sood, A.K., and Tredwell, T.J., in Semiconductors and Semimetals. edited by Willardson, R.K. and Beer, A.C. (Academic, New York, 1981), Vol.18, p.304.Google Scholar
[2] Kinch, M.A., Chapman, R.A., Simmons, A., Buss, D.D., and Borello, S.R., Infrared Phys. 20,1 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Franciosi, A., Philip, P., and Peterman, D.J., Phys.Rev. B 32, 8100 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Friedman, D.J., Carey, G.P., Shih, C.K., Lindau, I., Spicer, W.E., and Wilson, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 1977 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Friedman, D.J., Carey, G.P., Lindau, I., and Spicer, W.E., Phys. Rev. B 35, 1188 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Davis, G.D., Beck, W.A., Kelly, M.K., Tache, M., and Margaritondo, G., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3157 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Spicer, W.E., Friedman, D.J., and Carey, G.P., J. Vac. Sci. Tecchnol. A 6, 2746 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Andreivskii, A.I., Teodorovich, A.S., and Schneider, A.D., Sov. Phys. Semicond. 7, 1112 (1974).Google Scholar
[9] Jones, C.L., Capper, P., Quelch, M.J.T., and Brown, M., J. Crystal Growth 64, 417 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Sobolewski, M.A. and Helms, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 638 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Pulfrey, D.L., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 32, 33 (1984).Google Scholar
[12] Card, H.C., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 23,538 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Rajkanan, K. and Anderson, W.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 35, 421 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Tseng, H. and Wu, C., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 299 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Green, M.A., King, F.D., and Shewchun, J., Solid State Electronics 17, 551572 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Davis, G.D., Beck, W.A., Byer, N.E., Daniels, R.R., and Margaritondo, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 546 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar