Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T05:51:03.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomic-Level and Effective Elastic Moduli at Grain Boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

I. Alber ,
J. L. Bassani ,
M. Khantha ,
V. Vitek  and
G. J. Wang
I. Alber
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U. S. A.
J. L. Bassani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U. S. A.
M. Khantha
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U. S. A.
V. Vitek
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U. S. A.
G. J. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U. S. A.
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between atomic structure and elastic properties of grain boundaries is investigated from both discrete and continuum points of view. A heterogeneous continuum model of the boundary is introduced where distinct phases are associated with individual atoms and possess their atomic level elastic moduli determined from the atomistic model. The complete fourth-order tensors of both the atomic-level and the effective elastic moduli are determined, where the latter are defined for sub-blocks from an infinite bicrystal and are calculated here for a relatively small number of atom layers above and below the grain boundary. These effective moduli are determined exactly for the discrete atomistic model, while only estimates from upper and lower bounds can be determined for the continuum model. Comparison between the atomistic results and those for the continuum model establishes the validity of this definition of elastic properties for heterogeneous structures at these scales. Furthermore, these comparisons as well as algebraic properties of the fourth-order tensor of moduli lead to criteria to assess the stability of a given grain boundary structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 229: Symposium Q – Structure/Property Relationships for Metal/Metal Interfaces , 1991 , 65
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ishida, Y., editor, Grain Boundary Structure and Related Phenomena, Trans. Japan Inst. Metals, 27 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Raj, R., and Sass, S. L., editors, Interface Science and Engineering ‘87, J. Phys. Paris, 49, C5 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Yoo, M. H., Clark, W. A. T., and Briant, C. L., editors, Interfacial Structure, Properties and Design, (Pittsburgh: Materials Research Society), Vol.122 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Aucouturier, M., editor, Intergranular and Interphase Boundaries in Materials, J. Phys. France, 51, C1 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Rihle, M., Evans, A. G., Ashby, M. F., and Hirth, J. P., editors, Metal-Ceramic Interfaces, (Oxford: Pergamon Press,1990).Google Scholar
6. Balluffi, R. W., Riihle, M., and Sutton, A. P., Mater. Sci. Eng., 89, 1 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Wolf, D., and Kluge, M, Scripta Metall., 24, 907 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Wolf, D., and Lutsko, J. F., J. Mater. Res., 4, 1427 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Wolf, D., Lutsko, J. F., and Kluge, M., Atomistic Simulation of Materials: Beyond Pair Potentials, edited by Vitek, V. and Srolovitz, D. J., (New York: Plenum Press), p. 245 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Adams, J. B., Wolfer, W. G., and Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev., B, 40, 9479 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Alber, I, Bassani, J. L., Khantha, M, Vitek, V., Wang, G., “Grain Boundaries as Heterogeneous Systems: Atomic and Continuum Elastic Properties,” submitted to Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. (1991).Google Scholar
12. Born, M., and Huang, K., Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954).Google Scholar
13. Martin, J. W., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 8, 2837 (1975).Google Scholar
14. Martin, J. W., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 8,, 2858 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wang, G. J., Sutton, A. P.,and Vitek, V.,Acta Metall., 32, 1093 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Finnis, M.W., and Sinclair, J.E., Phil. Mag., A, 50, 45 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Ackland, G.J., Finnis, M.W., and Vitek, V., J.Phys.F: Metal Phys., 18, L153 (1988).Google Scholar
18. Knops, R.J., and Payne, L.E., Uniqueness Theorems in Linear Elasticity, (New York: Springer), Vol.19 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Willis, J. R., Advances in Applied Mechanics, 21, 1; 1983, J. Appl. Mech., 50, 1202(1981).Google Scholar
20. Gurtin, M.E., Q. Appl. Math., 20, 379 (1963).Google Scholar
21. Milton, G. W., Comm. on Pure and Appl. Math, 43, 63 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Bassani, J. L., and Qu, J., 1990, Metal-Ceramic Interfaces, edited by Rühle, M., Evans, A. G., Ashby, M. F., and Hirth, J. P., (Oxford: Pergamon Press).Google Scholar