Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:06:28.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomic Scale Study Of Precipitate / Matrix Interfaces in a Metallic Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

I. Rozdilsky ,
A. Cerezo ,
G. D. W. Smith  and
A. Watson
I. Rozdilsky
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, UK
A. Cerezo
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, UK
G. D. W. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, UK
A. Watson
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PH, UK
Get access

Abstract

The study of phase transformations involves making assumptions about interfaces within a material in order to apply mathematical models. An example of this is the Gibbs classical theory of nucleation and growth which is based upon the assumption that the precipitate / matrix interface is sharp. Recent developments in atom probe microscopy have made it possible for the first time to characterize complex three-dimensional internal interfaces within materials to sub-nanometre accuracy. We have used the OPoSAP (Optical Position Sensitive Atom Probe) to characterize the precipitate / matrix interface in the dilute Cu-Co system which is a model alloy for the study of homogeneous nucleation and growth. Interface widths derived from radial composition profiles were measured to be 0.9 ± 0.2 nm in size. The effects of thermal energy, positioning inaccuracies, and statistical limitations on the measurement of interface widths are examined through the use of mathematical models and computer simulations. Similar widths are measured for precipitates in the coarsening regime which shows the interface velocity does not affect the interface width.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 481: Symposium P – Science and Technology of Semiconductor Surface Preparation , 1997 , 521
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Cerezo, A., Godfrey, T.J., and Smith, G. D. W., Rev.Sci.Instr., 59, 862 (1988).Google Scholar
2 Miller, M. K., Cerezo, A., Hetherington, M. G., and Smith, G. D. W., Atom Probe Field Ion Microscopy, Oxford University Press, Oxford Science Publications 1996.Google Scholar
3 Degischer, H. P., Phil. Mag., 26, 1137 (1972).Google Scholar
4 Richards, C. G., Stobbs, W. M., J. Appl. Cryst., 8, 226 (1975)Google Scholar
5 Aaronson, H. I. and LeGoues, F. K., Metall. Trans. A, 23A, 1915 (1992).Google Scholar
6 Rozdilsky, I., presented at the 1997 TMS fall meeting, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1997 (to be published).Google Scholar
7 Setna, R. P., Phil, D.., University of Oxford (1994).Google Scholar
8 Hyde, J. M., Cerezo, A., Miller, M. K., Setna, R. P., and Smith, G. D. W., Diffusional Phase Transformations on the Atomic Scale: Experiment and Modelling, “Mathematics of Microstructure Evolution”, eds Chen, L. Q., Fultz, B., Cahn, J. W., Manning, J. R., Morral, J. E. and Simmons, J.A., publ. TMS, Warrendale, Pa., U.S.A. (1997), pp.245–268.Google Scholar
9 Hyde, J. M., Cerezo, A., Setna, R. P., Warren, P. J., Smith, G. D. W., Applied Surface Science, 76/77, 382–391 (1994).Google Scholar