Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:31:09.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of aluminium metallisation by nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

S. M. Soare
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
S. J. Bull
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
A. Horsfall
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
J. Dos Santos
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
A. G. O'Neill
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
N. G. Wright
Affiliation:
School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Get access

Abstract

As the trend for miniaturisation in the microelectronics field continues, metallisation connecting components has smaller and smaller dimensions, especially width and thickness. The mechanical properties of the deposited metal are very different from those of the bulk material and it is important to evaluate them accurately if the reliability of the metallisation is to be optimised. The assessment of the mechanical properties of thin aluminium metallisation is possible by nanoindentation but to extract properties useful for lifetime prediction such as yield stress or creep relaxation behaviour additional modelling is necessary using finite elements analysis (FEA). In this study evaporated aluminium layers from 50nm to 600nm thick on (100) silicon were indented to various depths. Proportional loading was used to minimise the effect of creep. The loading curves were then simulated by FEA and the results compared to identify the yield properties of the coating. Modelling data for thicker samples closely follows experimental data but for thinner coatings there is a considerable gradient in properties through the film thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kramer, D.E., Volinsky, A.A., Moody, N.R. and Gerberich, W.W., J. Mater. Res., 16 (2001) 3150.Google Scholar
2. Thornton, J.A., Ann. Rev. Mat. Sci., 1, 239 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Cheng, Y.T. and Cheng, C.M., Phil. Mag. Lett., 8, 9 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res., 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Oila, A. and Bull, S.J., Metall, Z., in press (2003).Google Scholar
6. ANSYS 5.7.1 SAS IP, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, 1999.Google Scholar
7. Liu, J., Mwanza, M.C., Reed, P.A.S. and Syngellakis, S., ANSYS application note (2002)Google Scholar
8. Fabes, B.D., Oliver, W.C., McKee, R.A. and Walker, F.J., J. Mater. Res., 7, 3056 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Tabor, D., The Hardness of Metals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951.Google Scholar
10. Tunvisut, K., Busso, E.P., O'Dowd, N.P. and Brantner, H.P., Phil. Mag., 82, 2013 (2002).Google Scholar
11. Petch, N.J., J. Iron Steel Institute, 174, 25 (1953).Google Scholar