Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:05:17.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artifacts in Atomic Force Microscopy of Nanoporous and Mesoporous Fiducial Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

H. W. Deckman  and
R. J. Plano
H. W. Deckman
Affiliation:
Corporate Research, Exxon Research & Engineering Co., Annandale, N.J.
R. J. Plano
Affiliation:
Corporate Research, Exxon Research & Engineering Co., Annandale, N.J.
Get access

Abstract

Artifacts dominate atomic force microscope (AFM) images of nanoporous and mesoporous inorganic oxide materials taken under ambient atmospheric conditions with currently available tips. Artifacts in these AFM images are attributed to tip-sample interactions and the sharpness of tips on currently available cantilevers. We show that by modifying currently available AFM tips with carbonaceous materials, many image artifacts are eliminated. To characterize image artifacts, a variety of fiducial samples with feature sizes between ∼100 Å and 2,000 Å are used. One of the most useful fiducial samples is a close packed array of holes in a commercially available alumina membrane and we suggest that it be adopted as a standard fiducial sample.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 295: Symposium W – Atomic-Scale Imaging of Surfaces and Interfaces , 1992 , 151
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Statterfield, C. N., Heterogeneous Catalysis In Industrial Practice, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1991), pp. 87–172.Google Scholar
2. Vaughn, D. in Zeolites: Facts, Figures, Future edited by Jacobs, P. A. and Santen, R. A. van (Studies In Surface Science And Catalysis 49, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989) pp. 95–119.Google Scholar
3. Brinker, C. J. and Scheer, G.W, Sol-Gel Science (Academic Press, Boston, 1990), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
4. Sinfelt, J. H., Bimetallic Catalysts (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983), pp. 131–155.Google Scholar
5. Jahnig, C. E., Campbell, D. L., and Martin, H. Z. in Proceedings Of International Fluidization Conference edited by Grace, J. R. and Matsen, J. M. (Engineering Foundation, Plenum Press, New York, 1980). pp. 51–98.Google Scholar
6. Leenaars, A. F., Keizer, K., and Burgraff, A. J., J. Mater. Sci. 19, 1077 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Rasch, P., Heckl, W. M., Deckman, H. W., and Haberlee, W. in Synthesis/ Characterization and Novel Applications Of Molecular Sieve Materials, edited by Bedard, R. L., Bein, T., Davis, M., Garces, J., Maroni, V., and Stuckey, G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 233, Pittsburgh PA, 1991) pp. 287–293.Google Scholar
8. Furneaux, R. C., Rigby, W. R., Davidson, A. P., Nature 377, 147 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Deckman, H. W. and Dunsmuir, J. H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B1, 1109 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Koops, H. W. P., Weiel, R., and Kern, D. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B6, 477 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Baker, R. T. K., Carbon 27, 315 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar