Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T03:32:16.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Investigation of PT/PT (111) Homoepitaxy with Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Static-Energy Calculation.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Ruoping wang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802–4400
Bryan S. Kalp
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802–4400
Kristen A. Fichthorn
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802–4400
Get access

Abstract

We present the results of a study of Pt/Pt (111) epitaxial thin-film growth with Molecular-dynamics simulation and static-energy calculation. Interatomic forces are modeled with Corrected-Effective-Medium theory. Atomic details of deposition, such as dissipation of the kinetic energy of an impinging gas atom, adatom motion on and approaching descending step edges, effects of the geometry of a step edge on the interlayer transport of adatoms, etc., have been intensively investigated. We have observed a novel mechanism for adatom incorporation into descending-step edges which involves a concerted motion of the adatom and edge atoms. Our study supports the “island size and shape” model which has been proposed to explain the reentrant layer-by-layer growth mode seen experimentally in Pt/Pt (111) homoepitaxy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]. Kunkel, R., Poelsema, B., Verheij, L. K., and Comsa, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 733 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]. Egelhoff, W. F. Jr., and Jacob, J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 921 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]. Bott, M., Michely, T., and Comsa, G., Surf. Sci., 272 161, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]. Wang, R. and Fichthorn, K. A., Molecular Simulation, 11, 105, 1993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]. Wang, R. and Fichthorn, K. A., to appear in Surface Science.Google Scholar
[6]. Raeker, T. J. and DePristo, A. E., Inter. Rev. in Phys. Chem. 10, 1 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]. Sanders, D. E., Stave, M. S., Perkins, L. S. and DePristo, A. E., Comput. Phys. Commun. 70, 579 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]. DePristo, A. E. and Meitu, H., J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1229 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]. Wang, S.C. and Ehrlich, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2509 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]. Michely, Th. and Comsa, G., Surface Sci. 256, 217, (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]. Nelson, R. C., Einstein, T. L., Khare, S. V., and Rous, P. J., to be published.Google Scholar
[12]. Sanders, D. E. and DePristo, A. E., Surf. Sci. 254, 341 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]. Sanders, D. E. and DePristo, A. E., Surf. Sci. Lett., 164, L169, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]. Smilauer, P., Wilby, M. R., and Vvedensky, Dimitri D., Phys. Rev. B 47, 4119, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar