Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T15:45:35.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of the Effect of System Variables on the Quality of Thin Films and Powders Produced by Laser-Breakdown Chemical Vapor Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

E.L. Joyce Jr.
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Mail Stop E-549, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
T.R. Jervis
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Mail Stop E-549, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
Get access

Abstract

A gas phase process for large area depositions on an ambient temperature substrate using laser-induced dielectric breakdown of gas phase precursors has recently been developed.1 Deposits of nickel alloys show excellent grain refinement (<10 nm) and metastable phase incorporation due to rapid quenching from the gas phase. Particle size distribution and compositional variance within the deposited films have been studied using electron microscopy and electron diffraction. Kinetic expressions to explain homogeneous gas phase nucleation and growth of the deposited materials have been developed in an effort to better understand this process. The effect of system variables on film and powder grain sizes has been studied. This analysis gives insight into the fluid flow/heat transfer patterns involved in the system and their effect on the final deposited material. The effect of system pressure, gas phase composition, and laser pulse energy, on particle size, surface area coverage, and deposition thickness are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Jervis, T.R. and Newkirk, L.R., J. Mat. Res., 1, 420 (1986).Google Scholar
2 Multicomponent Ultrafine Microstructures Symposium V, Presented at the 1986 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, Mass, 1986 (unpublished).Google Scholar
3 Gleiter, H. and Marquardt, P., Z. Metallic., 21, 263 (1984).Google Scholar
4 Okuyama, K., Kousaka, Y., Tohge, N., Yamamoto, S., Wu, J.J., Flagan, R.C. and Seinfeld, J.H., AIChE Journal, 21, 2010 (1986).Google Scholar
5 Menon, S.K., Jervis, T.R. and Nastasi, M. in Science and Technology of Rapidly Quenched Alloys, edited by Tenhover, M., Tanner, L.E., and Johnson, W.L., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc, 80, Pittsburgh, Pa. 1986) pp. 269275.Google Scholar
6 Radziemski, L.J., Cremers, D.A. and Niemcyzk, T.M., Spectrochimica Acta, 40B. 517 (1985).Google Scholar
7 Hill, P.G., Witting, H., and Demetri, E.P., J. of Heat Transfer, 85, 303 (1963).Google Scholar
8 Butterworth, D. and Hewitt, G.F., Two Phase Flow in Heat Transfer. (Oxford Univ. Press, 1977) p 401.Google Scholar
9 Oswatitsch, K., Z.Angew. Math. u. Mech., 22, 1 (1942).Google Scholar
10 Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C., Conduction of Heat in Solids. (Oxford Univ. Press, 1959) p258.Google Scholar
11 Turkdogan, E.T., Physical Chemistry of High Temperature Technology. (Academic Press, 1980), p.92106.Google Scholar