Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:47:36.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Air Independent Fuel Cells Utilizing Borohydride and Hydrogen Peroxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Richard Craig Urian
Richard Craig Urian*
Affiliation:
richard.urian@navy.mil, Naval Undersea Warfare Center, 1176 Howell St., Building 1302, Newport, Rhode Island, 02841, United States, 401-832-6697, 401-832-2980
Get access

Abstract

The US Navy continues to pursue electrochemical power sources with high energy density for low rate, long endurance air independent, undersea applications. The use of borohydride and hydrogen peroxide as fuel and oxidant sources offer several different fuel cell configurations; each with their own advantages and technical challenges.

The direct electro-oxidation and electro-reduction of sodium borohydride and hydrogen peroxide is conceptually a simple system. In the fuel cell configuration where Nafion 115 is used and both electrolyte solutions are allowed to have a pH >8, high efficiencies (>70%) can be maintained with careful control of the concentration of reactants in the flowing electrolyte, choice of catalyst and electrode architecture. The onset of borate precipitation is offset by diffusion of water created by the osmotic pressure between anode and cathode.

The direct liquid/liquid system has the potential to be a “2V” system if the pH of the hydrogen peroxide catholyte is maintained at a pH<1. In order to make this a viable system for Naval applications, the amount of acid used in the catholyte to establish the desired pH needs to be minimized. The key enabling technology is the development of a suitable anion exchange membrane. The characteristics of the anion membrane are: 1) conduct hydroxides generated at the cathode to the anode in order to minimize its concentration buildup in the catholyte solution and to maintain the desired pH.<1, 2) minimize hydrogen peroxide cross-over and 3) afford high ionic conductivity.

Efforts are currently underway to improve the understanding of the reaction mechanism of borohydride at the catalyst surface and to identify membranes with higher ionic conductivity. These efforts have been identified as critical paths for the successful development of a liquid/liquid borohydride/hydrogen peroxide fuel cell.

Keywords

energy generationenergy storageelectrodeposition
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1213: Symposium T – Nanomaterials for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells , 2009 , 1213-T01-09
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Leon, C. Ponce de, Walsh, F. C., Pletcher, D., Browning, D.J., Lakeman, J. B., J. Power Sources, 115, (2006) 172–181.Google Scholar
2 Pourbaix, M., “Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibrium in Aqueous Solutions,” Pergamon, New York, pp 106–111, 1974.Google Scholar
3 Cichon, J., Bessette, R., Dischert, D., “Electrode surface modification for cathode catalysis in semi-fuel cells,” Proceedings of the 194th Electrochemical Society Meeting, Boston, MA, 1998.Google Scholar
4 Bessette, R. R., Cichon, J. M., Dischert, D. W., Dow, E. G., J. Power Sources, 80 (1999) 248–253.Google Scholar
5 Atwan, M. H., Macdonald, C. L. B., Northwood, D. O., Gyenge, E. L., J. Power Sources, 158 (2006) 36–44.Google Scholar
6 Miley, G. H., Luo, N., Mather, J., Burton, R., Hawkins, G., Gu, L., Byrd, E., Gimlin, R., Shrestha, P. J., Benavides, G., Laystrom, J., Carroll, D., J. Power Sources, 165 (2007) 509–516.Google Scholar
7 Celik, C., San, F. G. B., Sarac, H. I., J. Power Sources, 185 (2008) 197–201.Google Scholar
8 Gyenge, E., Atwan, M., Northwood, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 153 (2006) A150–A158.Google Scholar
9 Luo, N., Miley, G. H., Kim, K. J., Burton, R., Huang, X., J. Power Sources, 185 (2008) 685–690.Google Scholar
10 Lyttle, D. A., Jensen, E.H., Struck, W.A., Analytical Chemistry, 24 (1952) 1843–1844.Google Scholar
11 Schumb, W. C., Satterfield, C.N., Wentworth, R.L. “Hydrogen Peroxide,” Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, p. 558, 1955.Google Scholar
12 Li, Z. P., Liu, B. H., Zhu, J. K., Suda, S., J. Power Sources, 163 (2006) 555–559.Google Scholar
13 Liu, B. H., Li, Z. P., Suda, S., Electrochem. Acta, 49 (2004) 3094–3105.Google Scholar
14 Urian, R. C., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Volume 1168E, (2009), 1168–P05.Google Scholar
15 Urian, R. C., Patrissi, C. J., Tucker, S. P., Deschenes, C. M., Bielwaski, F. W., Atwater, D. W., Proceeding of the 43rd Power Sources Conference, Philadelphia, PA, (2008) 295–298.Google Scholar
16 Saito, M., Arimura, N., Hayamizu, K., Okada, T., J. Phys. Chem. B, 108 (2004) 16064–16070.Google Scholar