Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T08:29:02.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFM/SEM Study of Thermally Induced Hillock Coalescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. Chaiken
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Solid State Science and Technology Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244–4100
Jerry Goodisman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Solid State Science and Technology Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244–4100
R. M. Villarica
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Solid State Science and Technology Program, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244–4100
J. V. Beasock
Affiliation:
Rome Laboratory, ERDR, Griffiss AFB, 13441
L. H. Walsh
Affiliation:
Rome Laboratory, ERDR, Griffiss AFB, 13441
Get access

Abstract

The growth of hillocks and voids in metal films was studied. The applicability of a model involving fractals and kinetic equations was examined on the basis of whether there is independent justification for using scaling arguments in the model and whether there is reason to connect the evolution of hillocks with that of voids. Hillocks and voids were found to be self-similar across about three orders of magnitude of variation in spatial scale with the same fractal dimension. Voids and hillocks were found to have the same fractal dimension whether studied using atomic force microscopy (AFM) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The parameters obtained from these fractal analyses demonstrate quantitative internal consistency with an earlier time dependent study of thermal annealing effects on hillock distributions. Remarkably, area-perimeter data obtained from either a long-time study of a single void or a spatial average of a large number of different voids both yield quantitatively identical results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goodisman, J., Chaiken, J., manuscript accepted Thin Solid Films (11/30/94)Google Scholar
2 Villarica, M., Casey, M. J., Goodisman, J., Chaiken, J., J. Chem. Phys. 98, 46104625 (1993)Google Scholar
3 Aceto, S., Chang, C. Y., Vook, R. W., Thin Solid Films 219, 8086 (1992)Google Scholar
4 Vook, R. W., Materials Chemistry and Physics 36, 199216 (1994)Google Scholar
5 Goodisman, J., Chaiken, J., J. Photochem Photobio. A. 80, 5359 (1994)Google Scholar
6 Botet, R. and Jullien, R., J. Phys. Math. A: Math. Gen. 17, 25172530 (1984)Google Scholar
7 Brady, John W., Doll, Jimmie D., Thompson, Donald L., J. Chem. Phys. 74, 10261028 (1981) and earlier papers referenced thereinGoogle Scholar
8 Langmuir, I., J. Meteorl. 5, 175192 (1948)Google Scholar
9 Jullien, R., New J. Chem. 14, 239 (1990)Google Scholar
10 Srivastava, R. C., J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 10911092 (1988)Google Scholar
11 Stockmayer, W.H., J. Chem. Phys. 11, 45 (1943)Google Scholar
12 Korvin, G., Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences. (Elsevier, New York, 1992) page 193 in connection withdiscussion of equation (3.1.7)Google Scholar
13 Korvin, G., Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences. (Elsevier, New York, 1992) (Elsevier, New York, 1992) page 171 Google Scholar
14 Korvin, G., Fractal Models in the Earth Sciences, (Elsevier, New York, 1992) (Elsevier, New York, 1992) page 66 Google Scholar
15 Kime, Yolanda J. and Grach, Peter, Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 338, 255260 (1994)Google Scholar
16 Thomas, Robert W. and Calabrese, Donald W., “Phenomenological Observations of Electromigration”, 21st Annual Proceedings International Reliability Physics Symposium(IRPS), 1983, pp. 1–9Google Scholar