Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T18:26:20.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adhesion Effects on the Recrystallization of Silicon Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

C. E. Bleil
Affiliation:
Electronics Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090-9055
J. R. Troxell
Affiliation:
Electronics Department, General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, Michigan 48090-9055
Get access

Abstract

Laser processing of thin films of amorphous or polycrystalline silicon on insulator substrates, such as the glass normally used for liquid crystal displays, frequently leads to film thickness variations which are unacceptable for device fabrication. Some thickness variations are caused by the high surface tension of molten silicon and the poor adhesion of the silicon to the substrate. Techniques to reduce this problem by increasing the adhesion of the film to silicon dioxide coated Corning 7059 glass substrates have been investigated. Two different approaches were used. First, silicon ions were implanted into the silicon-glass interface to increase the direct bonding of the silicon to the silicon dioxide. Second, layers of material known to exhibit better adhesion to both silicon and silicon dioxide were introduced between the silicon film and the glass substrate. Both techniques produced films which, after subsequent laser processing, showed significantly reduced thickness variations. These procedures make it possible to laser process thin films of silicon on Corning 7059 glass substrates under conditions which produce large grain polysilicon films without producing unacceptably large thickness variations or film cracking.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Laff, R.A., and Hutchins, G.L., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices Ed–21, 743 (1974).Google Scholar
2. Bosch, M.A., and Lemons, R.A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 40, 166 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Matsumura, M., and Hayama, H., Proc. IEEE, 68, 1349 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Matsui, M., Shiraki, Y., Katayama, Y., Kobayashi, K.L.I., Shintani, A., and Maruyama, E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 37, 936 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Stephen, J., Smith, B.J., and Blamires, N.G., Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, Ed. White, C.W., and Peercy, P.S. Academic Press, N.Y. 1980, p. 639 et sequel.Google Scholar
6. Stultz, T., Gibbons, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., 13, 463 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Geis, M.W., Smith, Henry I., Tsaur, B-Y., Fan, John C.C., Silversmith, P.J., Mountain, R.W., and Chapman, R.L., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 477, 463 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Yablonovitch, E., and Gmitter, T., 1983 MRS Ann. Meeting, Boston, Extended Abs., p. 36.Google Scholar
9. Weinberg, Z.A., Deline, V.R., Sedgwick, T.O., Cohen, S.A., Aliotta, C.F., Clark, G.J., and Langford, W.A., Appl. Phys. Lett., 43, 1105 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Nissim, Y.I., Lietoila, A., Gold, R.B., and Gibbons, J.F., J. Appl. Phys., 51, 274 (1980).Google Scholar
11. Burgener, M.L., and Reedy, R.E., J. Appl. Phys., 53, 4357 (1982).Google Scholar
12. Williams, J.S., Brown, W.L., Leamy, H.J., Poate, J.M., Rodgers, J.W., Rousseau, D., Rozgonyi, G.A., Shelnutt, J.A., and Sheng, T.T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 33, 542 (1978).Google Scholar
13. Donovan, E.P., Spaepen, F., Turnbull, D., Poate, J.M., and Jacobson, D.C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 42, 698 (1983).Google Scholar
14. Paulson, W.M., and Wilson, S.R., J. of Electronic Materials, 12, 107 (1983).Google Scholar